2007
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Gammaherpesviral Internal Repeat Contributes to Latency Amplification

Abstract: BackgroundGammaherpesviruses cause important infections of humans, in particular in immunocompromised patients. The genomes of gammaherpesviruses contain variable numbers of internal repeats whose precise role for in vivo pathogenesis is not well understood.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe used infection of laboratory mice with murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68) to explore the biological role of the 40 bp internal repeat of MHV-68. We constructed several mutant viruses partially or completely lacking this rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the lower CpG frequency of MHV-68 genomes does not support rapid recruitment of PRC complexes in a genome-wide fashion, our data suggest that the internal repeat regions may nevertheless serve as seed regions for polycomb acquisition. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that the left internal repeat region has been previously found to be important for latency amplification in vivo [41]. In the right panel of Fig 11 we have therefore depicted a scenario in which PRC1.1 binds initially at CpG-rich (repeat) regions of the MHV-68 genome in a delayed manner (or as the result of a stochastically rare event), followed by spreading of PRCs and associated histone modifications via canonical complexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…While the lower CpG frequency of MHV-68 genomes does not support rapid recruitment of PRC complexes in a genome-wide fashion, our data suggest that the internal repeat regions may nevertheless serve as seed regions for polycomb acquisition. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that the left internal repeat region has been previously found to be important for latency amplification in vivo [41]. In the right panel of Fig 11 we have therefore depicted a scenario in which PRC1.1 binds initially at CpG-rich (repeat) regions of the MHV-68 genome in a delayed manner (or as the result of a stochastically rare event), followed by spreading of PRCs and associated histone modifications via canonical complexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…To determine whether the v-cyclin was uniquely able to promote EC survival following ␥HV68 infection, we tested additional candidate genes for their contribution to EC survival: M11, M3, mK3, M1, M2, v-GPCR, and the viral polymerase III transcripts. Importantly, these viral genes have previously been identified as being dispensable for lytic replication in vitro (3,4,7,66,71). The viability of ECs (MB114 cells) infected with wt ␥HV68 or gene-specific mutant viruses was examined at 6 days postinfection by staining with annexin V and PI ( Thus, our viability screen identified several additional candidate genes that play a part in EC survival and persistence during ␥HV68 infection.…”
Section: Ec Survivors Of ␥Hv68 Infection Show Signs Of Autophagymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral load in the spleens of infected mice was quantified by real-time PCR using the ABI 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), as described (20). Briefly, amplification was performed with Taqman universal PCR master mix and universal cycling conditions (Applied Biosystems).…”
Section: Measurement Of Viral Load By Quantitative Real-time Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%