A game-theoretic approach for electric vehicle adoption and policy decisions under different market structures

Chakraborty, Abhishek; Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan; Bhaskar, Kalyan

doi:10.1080/01605682.2019.1678407

Cited by 46 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[63] Low purchase costs Costs associated with purchasing e-mobility transport solution are low. [20,[65][66][67][68] Enhances sustainability…”

Section: Unstructured Expert Interviews and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Especially concerning the CO 2 emissions and raw material sourcing. [62,64,66], [67,[69][70][71][72][73] Low noise generation Noise emission generated during the usage of the e-mobility transport solution is low. [63,64] Conforms to legal requirements Meets quality certification E-mobility transport solution meets quality certification requirements (e.g., CE or ISO).…”

Section: Unstructured Expert Interviews and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study introduces e-mobility for humanitarian purposes and presents the first investigation of innovative e-mobility transport solutions (e.g., e-bike, e-stretcher, and drone) for mountain rescue. In practice, it is largely unclear which e-mobility transport solutions might be suitable and what selection attributes are to be considered. The subsequent study supports the technology selection process by identifying and measuring relevant selection attributes to facilitate the adoption of e-mobility in this domain. For the purpose of this study, a multi-method research approach that combines qualitative and quantitative elements was applied. In the first step, results of a systematic search for attributes in literature were combined with inputs gained from unstructured expert interviews and discussions. The perceived importance of the identified selection attributes was then measured by analyzing survey data of 341 rescue workers using the best-worst scaling methodology. Finally, the results were reiterated in another expert discussion to assess their overall validity. Study results indicate that e-mobility transport solutions need to primarily enhance operational performance and support the safety of mountain rescue personnel. Surprisingly, economic and sustainability aspects are less of an issue in the process of technology selection.

show abstract

“…[63] Low purchase costs Costs associated with purchasing e-mobility transport solution are low. [20,[65][66][67][68] Enhances sustainability…”

Section: Unstructured Expert Interviews and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Unstructured Expert Interviews and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zhen et al (2020) investigate the mode selection system in hybrid EVs based on the background of green logistics. Chakraborty et al (2021) investigate the effect of using a combination of subsidy on EV and green-tax on conventional GVs on overall social welfare, environmental impact, and vehicle stock in monopoly and duopoly forms of market structures.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Game-Theoretic Analytical Approach for Fostering Energy-Saving Innovation in the Electric Vehicle Supply Chain

Wang

Huang

2021

SAGE Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motivated by the industrial observation that electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers are often fully or partially outsourcing some specific components, for instance, powertrains and battery systems, and rely on their suppliers’ energy-saving innovation to improve their own EVs’ comprehensive performances, this study builds an analytical framework to investigate how different cooperation modes affect the EV supply chain’s energy-saving performance and firms’ profitability. As a main barrier preventing potential consumers from purchasing EVs, the consumer range anxiety for EVs’ performance was incorporated into the analytical model. Three primary cases and one strategic alliance case are sequentially analyzed. The results show that the supplier always self-motivates to implement energy-saving innovation to improve the performance of the core component, and the EV manufacturer is always willing to participate in its supplier’s energy-saving innovation by sharing a fraction of the investment. Moreover, a strategic alliance between the manufacturer and the supplier can effectively improve the profit of the whole supply chain. This strategic alliance can be coordinated through a generalized Nash-bargaining mechanism.

show abstract

“…For example, governments may provide subsidies to improve the development of low-carbon supply chain [ 34 , 35 ]. Hybrid Electric Vehicles are also subsidized to replace the fuel vehicles gradually [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. As the investment in environment-friendly equipment or capacity may cost too much, the short-sighted manufacturers may produce with energy-intensive or highly-polluting manufacturing capacity.…”

Section: Extension: the Stability Analysis Of The Capacity Investmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Capacity Sharing and Capacity Investment of Environment-Friendly Manufacturing: Strategy Selection and Performance Analysis

Xie

Han

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many small manufacturing factories suffer insufficient environment-friendly capacity after eliminating the outdated and environmental-harmful production capacity according to stringent environmental rules and regulations. This paper analyzes two strategies that the manufacturer with limited environment-friendly capacity may take to tackle this problem, i.e., investing in building environment-friendly capacities and collaborating with the manufacturer with sufficient environment-friendly capacity in capacity sharing. In a supply chain with two competing manufacturers, this paper builds game-theoretical models and investigates equilibrium solutions under three scenarios (no capacity investment or sharing, capacity investment, and capacity sharing). Then this research investigates the feasible regions of these two strategies and compares the performance of each manufacturer under each scenario. The findings show that both capacity investment and capacity sharing can effectively reduce the profit loss of the manufacturer with limited capacity, while only capacity sharing benefits both manufacturers. The feasibility of these two strategies depends on the initial capacity volume and the capacity investment cost coefficient of the manufacturer with limited capacity. Moreover, the preference of the manufacturer with limited capacity for each strategy depends on the capacity investment cost coefficient. When the capacity investment cost coefficient is relatively high, the win-win situation exists for supply chain members. Furthermore, with the use of chaos theory, the paper shows how to adjust the capacity investment in each period to keep the system stable.

show abstract

A game-theoretic approach for electric vehicle adoption and policy decisions under different market structures

Cited by 46 publications

References 40 publications

Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations

Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations

A Game-Theoretic Analytical Approach for Fostering Energy-Saving Innovation in the Electric Vehicle Supply Chain

Capacity Sharing and Capacity Investment of Environment-Friendly Manufacturing: Strategy Selection and Performance Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About