A Future Planet of Weeds?

Simberloff, Daniel

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89684-3_17

Cited by 3 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 89 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Further environmental and socioeconomic impacts can be expected in rangeshifting non-native species due to hybridisation (Essl et al 2019;Wallingford et al 2020;Seebens et al 2021). However, this requires an understanding of their potential interactions in new environments (Guo 2006;Wallingford et al 2020;Seebens et al 2021) as well as of the extent of such impacts (Wallingford et al 2020;Simberloff 2022). All of this would require monitoring programmes and gathering local ecological information.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Under the challenging conditions of global change, a major task of invasion biology is to identify those high-risk species that are more likely to cause negative impacts. Usually, species that are either non-native invasive or 'expanding native' (Simberloff et al 2012;Díaz et al 2019;Essl et al 2019;Simberloff 2022;Yazlık and Üremiş 2022) and that become dominant in natural habitats may exert direct or indirect impacts on community structure and composition, species interactions and ecosystem functions, all of which can result in a 'domino effect' (Hawkins et al 2015;Pyšek et al 2017Hulme and Bernard-Verdier 2018;Díaz et al 2019;Brundu et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Do non-native and dominant native species carry a similar risk of invasiveness? A case study for plants in Turkey

Yazlık¹,

Ambarlı²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most risk analysis studies in invasion biology have focused on the invasiveness of non-native species, even though some native species also can pose a high risk to the environment and human well-being. This is especially true under current global change, which may cause dominant native species to expand their range of distribution and have substantial effects on the ecosystem. In this study, the risk of invasiveness of five non-native and five native plant species in Turkey was evaluated using a standard risk screening protocol. All ten species selected for screening are known to be invasive in several parts of the world, i.e. non-native Ailanthus altissima, Cuscuta campestris, Phytolacca americana, Robinia pseudoacacia and Sicyos angulatus, and native Cirsium arvense, Hedera helix, Onopordum acanthium, Phragmites australis and Sorghum halepense. The Australian Weed Risk Assessment decision-support tool adapted to Turkey’s geographical and climatic conditions was used for screening the study species based on their biological traits, ecology and management approaches. All species were classified as high-risk, with R. pseudoacacia among non-natives and P. australis among natives achieving the highest scores followed by S. halepense, C. campestris, C. arvense, O. acanthium, P. americana, S. angulatus, A. altissima and H. helix. Based on their risk scores, all non-native species were classified as invasive and all native species as ‘expanding’ for Turkey. An ordination based on the risk scores showed similarities between invasive and expanding species. The outcomes of this study indicate that species can have several risk-related traits resulting in high risk scores irrespective of their origin. Such species can modify their environment and interact with other species with severe consequences for biodiversity. It is argued that dominant species with highly negative environmental and socioeconomic impacts in their habitats should be included in priority lists for management measures irrespective of their origin (i.e. native or non-native). More studies are needed to evaluate the magnitude and prevalence of the present findings for other regions worldwide.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do non-native and dominant native species carry a similar risk of invasiveness? A case study for plants in Turkey

Yazlık¹,

Ambarlı²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…O monitoramento com uso de drones para fins de detecção precoce em ambientes abertos como campos e restingas é promissor especialmente para espécies arbóreas como acácias (Acacia mangium), pinheiros-americanos (Pinus spp.) e casuarina (Casuarina equisetifolia) (Lehmann et al 2017, Gonçalves et al 2022, Simberloff 2022. Adicionalmente, constelações de nanosatélites, assim como satélites gerando imagens de alta resolução, podem vir a substituir drones para uso na detecção precoce de espécies invasoras (Simberloff 2022).…”

Section: Uso De Drones (Vant)unclassified

Opções para a gestão e o manejo de espécies exóticas invasoras

Zilller,

Ramos,

Galheigo

et al. 2024

Relatório Temático Sobre Espécies Exóticas Invasoras, Biodiversidade E Serviços Ecossistêmicos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Cenário Futurounclassified

“…e casuarina (Casuarina equisetifolia) (Lehmann et al 2017, Gonçalves et al 2022, Simberloff 2022. Adicionalmente, constelações de nanosatélites, assim como satélites gerando imagens de alta resolução, podem vir a substituir drones para uso na detecção precoce de espécies invasoras (Simberloff 2022). A utilização de equipamentos para aspersão de herbicidas via aérea, já em uso na agricultura, é altamente desejável para áreas de difícil trânsito e difícil acesso ou áreas com risco para a movimentação de pessoas.…”

Section: Cenário Futurounclassified

Relatório temático sobre espécies exóticas invasoras, biodiversidade e serviços ecossistêmicos

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3.2. Vetores de mudança diretos que promovem a introdução, estabelecimento e disseminação de espécies exóticas invasoras | 95 3.3. Vetores de mudança indiretos que promovem a introdução, o estabelecimento e a disseminação de espécies exóticas invasoras | 107 3.4. Efeitos múltiplos, aditivos ou de interação entre os vetores de mudança que promovem a introdução, o estabelecimento e a disseminação de espécies exóticas invasoras | 116 3.5. Lacunas de conhecimento | 120 Referências | 121

show abstract

A Future Planet of Weeds?

Cited by 3 publications

References 89 publications

Do non-native and dominant native species carry a similar risk of invasiveness? A case study for plants in Turkey

Do non-native and dominant native species carry a similar risk of invasiveness? A case study for plants in Turkey

Opções para a gestão e o manejo de espécies exóticas invasoras

Relatório temático sobre espécies exóticas invasoras, biodiversidade e serviços ecossistêmicos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

A Future Planet of Weeds?

Cited by 3 publications

References 89 publications

﻿Do non-native and dominant native species carry a similar risk of invasiveness? A case study for plants in Turkey

﻿Do non-native and dominant native species carry a similar risk of invasiveness? A case study for plants in Turkey

Opções para a gestão e o manejo de espécies exóticas invasoras

Relatório temático sobre espécies exóticas invasoras, biodiversidade e serviços ecossistêmicos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Do non-native and dominant native species carry a similar risk of invasiveness? A case study for plants in Turkey

Do non-native and dominant native species carry a similar risk of invasiveness? A case study for plants in Turkey