2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11103-011-9803-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A functionally required unfoldome from the plant kingdom: intrinsically disordered N-terminal domains of GRAS proteins are involved in molecular recognition during plant development

Abstract: The intrinsic disorder is highly abundant in eukaryotic genomes. In the animal kingdom, numerous intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) have been characterized, especially in cell signalling and transcription regulation. An intrinsically disordered region often folds in different structures allowing an IDP to recognize and bind different partners at various binding interfaces. In contrast, there have only been a few reports of IDPs from the plant kingdom. Plant-specific GRAS proteins play critical and divers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
170
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
170
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the divergence of the N terminus of the GRAS proteins during evolution increased the functional capacity of the protein family, including the mediation of gibberellin and phyA signals. Sun et al (2011) predicted that molecular recognition features within GRAS protein N termini can adopt different tertiary structures facilitating the recruitment of additional protein partners. This could suggest that the N-terminal domain determines the specificity for a distinct pathway, whereas the C-terminal so-called "GRAS domain" carries out an as yet unknown function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the divergence of the N terminus of the GRAS proteins during evolution increased the functional capacity of the protein family, including the mediation of gibberellin and phyA signals. Sun et al (2011) predicted that molecular recognition features within GRAS protein N termini can adopt different tertiary structures facilitating the recruitment of additional protein partners. This could suggest that the N-terminal domain determines the specificity for a distinct pathway, whereas the C-terminal so-called "GRAS domain" carries out an as yet unknown function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together these observations suggest that the quadrant (Q3) is likely to contain proteins containing relatively balanced contributions of structured and disordered regions. For this reason here we have named the proteins in this quadrant mixed rather than collapsed disorder, a description that may have appeared in previous publications [16][17][18]. These observations don't rule out the possibility that some of the proteins in (Q3) or even in (Q4) might be native molten globules.…”
Section: Structural Partitioning By the Ch-cdf Plotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the plant developmental proteins called GRAS straddled the structure and mixed quadrant (Q2, Q3). The N-domains of these proteins localized to the mixed and disordered quadrants (Q4, Q3), while almost all of the C-domains of these proteins localized to the structured quadrant (Q2) [18].…”
Section: Disorder Subtypes and Idp Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The N-terminal region of GRAS proteins is variable, whereas the C-terminal sequence is highly conserved, and contains five motifs; leucine heptad repeat I (LHRI), VHIID, leucine heptad repeat II (LHRII), PFYRE, and SAW (Pysh et al, 1999;Bolle, 2004). It is noted that the conserved domains in the C-terminus are related to transcriptional regulation; however, the N-terminus targets the downstream proteins and determines the specificity of function (Sun et al, 2011). The GRAS protein family can be divided into eight subfamilies that have been named either after their members or after a common motif: DELLA, HAM, LISCL, PAT, LS, SCR, SHR, and SCL3 subfamilies (Tian et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%