2017
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fully Bayesian latent variable model for integrative clustering analysis of multi-type omics data

Abstract: Identification of clinically relevant tumor subtypes and omics signatures is an important task in cancer translational research for precision medicine. Large-scale genomic profiling studies such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network have generated vast amounts of genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic, and proteomic data. While these studies have provided great resources for researchers to discover clinically relevant tumor subtypes and driver molecular alterations, there are few computationally effi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
151
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Z matrix is used as in iCluster for the clustering. The latest extension of iCluster, which builds on iCluster+, is iClusterBayes [66]. This method replaces the regularization in iCluster+ with full Bayesian regularization.…”
Section: Icluster and Icluster+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Z matrix is used as in iCluster for the clustering. The latest extension of iCluster, which builds on iCluster+, is iClusterBayes [66]. This method replaces the regularization in iCluster+ with full Bayesian regularization.…”
Section: Icluster and Icluster+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms with similar aims that decompose aggregations of data matrices into lower dimension spaces have also been developed [Chalise and Fridley, 2017, Chalise et al, 2014, Chen et al, 2008. Mo et al [2017]. A Bayesian model makes the common boundary assumption and additionally encodes sparsity into the model via use of priors on variable inclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare PAMOGK with eight other multi-omics methods. These include kmeans [26], MCCA [54], LRACluster [55], rMKL-LPP [45], iClusterBayes [29], PINS [34], SNF [51], and finally Spectral Clustering [58]. These methods cover all methods that are included in a recent comparative benchmark study by Rappoport et al [36] with the exception of multiNMF [24], which we are not able to run properly.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the Art Multi-omics Methods Permentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are sophisticated early integration approaches that aim to overcome these problems. iClusterBayes and its earlier variants [42,30,29] and LRACluster assume a latent lower dimensional distribution of data and uses regularization. A different strategy is to deploy late integration approaches, in which the samples are clustered with each omic data type separately, and the ensemble's cluster assignments are combined into a single solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%