2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
343
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 515 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
343
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to monitor fixation, we recorded the electrooculogram (EOG) using the setup of Schlögl and colleagues (Schlögl et al 2007). EOG artifacts were identified in a semiautomatic procedure using the EOG artifact detection function of the Fieldtrip toolbox (Oostenveld et al 2011).…”
Section: Global Motion Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to monitor fixation, we recorded the electrooculogram (EOG) using the setup of Schlögl and colleagues (Schlögl et al 2007). EOG artifacts were identified in a semiautomatic procedure using the EOG artifact detection function of the Fieldtrip toolbox (Oostenveld et al 2011).…”
Section: Global Motion Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Off-line analysis was performed using EMEGS (freely available at http://www.emegs.org/) (Peyk et al, 2011) and included filtering (0.1 Hz high-pass and 40 Hz low-pass), removal of eye movement artifacts (Schlögl et al, 2007), artifact detection and sensor interpolation, and average reference. A baseline correction based on the 100 ms before stimulus onset was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG and EOG signals were digitized with a sampling frequency of 256 Hz, powerline notch filtered at 50 Hz and high-pass filtered at 0.5 Hz. Additionally, the horizontal, vertical, and radial EOG were computed to remove the EOG from the EEG using a regression algorithm [16]. The data acquisition and on-line processing was developed under a self-made BCI platform.…”
Section: A Data Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%