2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework to Account for Sedimentation and Diffusion in Particle–Cell Interactions

Abstract: In vitro experiments provide a solid basis for understanding the interactions between particles and biological systems. An important confounding variable for these studies is the difference between the amount of particles administered and that which reaches the surface of cells. Here, we engineer a hydrogel-based nanoparticle system and combine in situ characterization techniques, 3D-printed cell cultures, and computational modeling to evaluate and study particle-cell interactions of advanced particle systems.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreased association between nanoparticles and HUVECs under flow conditions may be related to the reduced exposure of these nanoparticles to cells even though the same number of particles had been introduced . In flow conditions, spherical nanoparticles tend to follow the cell medium streamlines when passing through the SMN; while in static conditions, all nanoparticles have a tendency to settle on the cell surfaces due to gravity . That said, the trend of association between HUVECs and PISA nanoparticles of different surface chemistries (i.e., COOH < PEG < Me < TA) is similar when comparing between static and flow conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The decreased association between nanoparticles and HUVECs under flow conditions may be related to the reduced exposure of these nanoparticles to cells even though the same number of particles had been introduced . In flow conditions, spherical nanoparticles tend to follow the cell medium streamlines when passing through the SMN; while in static conditions, all nanoparticles have a tendency to settle on the cell surfaces due to gravity . That said, the trend of association between HUVECs and PISA nanoparticles of different surface chemistries (i.e., COOH < PEG < Me < TA) is similar when comparing between static and flow conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Conventional cell uptake or cytotoxicity study are normally performed on 2D cell monolayer or 3D tumor spheroids in a well plate where the culture medium is static, and this might lead to false positive results, because sedimentation of nanoparticles may occur when the culture medium is static . Therefore, drug evaluation under flow conditions might be more relevant as it better mimics the real in vivo conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S3). [40][41][42] Both particle types were fluorescently labelled with Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488) before the silica templates were removed with buffered hydrofluoric acid. Particles were characterized using optical microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy, microelectrophoresis (to calculate zeta (ζ)potentials), and flow cytometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%