2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19030486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fourier Descriptor of 2D Shapes Based on Multiscale Centroid Contour Distances Used in Object Recognition in Remote Sensing Images

Abstract: A shape descriptor is an effective tool for describing the shape feature of an object in remote sensing images. Researchers have put forward a lot of excellent descriptors. The discriminability of some descriptors is very strong in the experiments, but usually their computational cost is large, which makes them unsuitable to be used in practical applications. This paper proposes a new descriptor-FMSCCD (Fourier descriptor based on multiscale centroid contour distance)—which is a frequency domain descriptor bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FMSCCD [19] 37.33% IDSC-WFW (a weighted Fourier and wavelet-like descriptor based on inner distance shape context) [34] 49.36% DIR [17] 46.45% AP & BAP [18] 52.79% MDM [16] 35.81% FPD (farthest point distance) [35] 26.63% FD [15] 27.97% FASD & FMSCCD (fast angle scale descriptor and FMSCCD) [19] 37.85% FD-ASD (Fourier descriptor-angle scale descriptor) [36] 27.44% ASD & CCD (angle scale descriptor and centroid contour distance) [36] 39.30% SC + DP [14] 67.27% IDSC + DP [13] 70.99% HSC (Hierarchical string cuts) [37] 56.80% SCN (ours) 75.39%…”
Section: Methods Classification Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…FMSCCD [19] 37.33% IDSC-WFW (a weighted Fourier and wavelet-like descriptor based on inner distance shape context) [34] 49.36% DIR [17] 46.45% AP & BAP [18] 52.79% MDM [16] 35.81% FPD (farthest point distance) [35] 26.63% FD [15] 27.97% FASD & FMSCCD (fast angle scale descriptor and FMSCCD) [19] 37.85% FD-ASD (Fourier descriptor-angle scale descriptor) [36] 27.44% ASD & CCD (angle scale descriptor and centroid contour distance) [36] 39.30% SC + DP [14] 67.27% IDSC + DP [13] 70.99% HSC (Hierarchical string cuts) [37] 56.80% SCN (ours) 75.39%…”
Section: Methods Classification Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMSCCD [19] 87.98% IDSC-WFW [34] 93.66% DIR [17] 88.20% MDM [16] 87.32% FPD [35] 77.16% FD [15] 82.40% FASD & FMSCCD [19] 91.04% FDASD [36] 87.32% ASD & CCD [36] 85.14% MLBP (modified LBP) [38] 96.83% SCN (ours) 94.46%…”
Section: Methods Classification Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computer-assisted methods allow the measurements of multiple magnitudes of objects, but often the measurements are made in two dimensions [16,17]. Thus, when applying artificial vision methods [18], figures are represented by the coordinates of a set of points in the plane, that can be submitted to algebraic transformations and compared with a set of figures in databases. Plant organs, in general, and seeds in particular, have a similarity with geometric objects, and the comparison between both 2D images, the plant structure, and the geometric model, provides a direct method for the quantitative description of shapes.…”
Section: A Conceptual Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burla et al [18] developed two modifi ed Fourier descriptors methods for fast detection of surface defects on microlens arrays, one kind of micro-optical elements. Zheng et al [19] introduced a revised Fourier descriptors based on multiscale centroid contour distance to recognize objects in remote sensing images. The theory of this approach is straightforward and computational effi ciency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%