2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00062.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Formal Assessment of Gene Flow and Selection in the Fire Ant Solenopsis Invicta

Abstract: Abstract. Recent studies of the introduced fire ant Solenopsis invicta suggest that introduced polygyne (with multiple queens per nest) populations are strongly influenced by male-mediated gene flow from neighboring monogyne (single queen per nest) populations and selection acting on a single locus, general . This investigation formally tests this hypothesis and determines if these processes can account for the genotypic structure of polygyne S. invicta. To increase the statistical power of this test, we consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical developments and associated empirical tests of a role for mixing (or gene flow) in constraining adaptive divergence have been excellent in certain contexts, such as spatial clines in selection (e.g., Porter et al 1997;Lenormand et al 1998) and Mendelian traits in discrete populations (e.g., Goodisman et al 2000). We focus on a context where theory has largely been absent: quantitative traits in spatially discrete populations.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical developments and associated empirical tests of a role for mixing (or gene flow) in constraining adaptive divergence have been excellent in certain contexts, such as spatial clines in selection (e.g., Porter et al 1997;Lenormand et al 1998) and Mendelian traits in discrete populations (e.g., Goodisman et al 2000). We focus on a context where theory has largely been absent: quantitative traits in spatially discrete populations.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monogyne and polygyne social forms also differ in a number of important reproductive, behavioral, and life history traits besides colony queen number [25],[26], differences that are also completely associated with differences at the genomic region marked by Gp-9 . In contrast, there is a complete lack of differentiation at genes not tightly linked to Gp-9 , presumably because frequent matings between sexuals from sympatric monogyne and polygyne colonies result in extensive gene flow between the forms [22], [27][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field surveys of workers and brood from polygyne colonies suggest that the relative frequencies of the Gp‐9 B and Gp‐9 b alleles differ from those expected under Mendelian, [Table S1 (Supporting information) summarizes results from Ross (); Goodisman et al . () and Fritz ()], but field surveys may include sources of bias that are difficult to account for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%