2014
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2014.918225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Forest Commons Revival in Slovenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scientific literature provides evidence of several initiatives and approaches that can be used to tackle managerial and organizational issues originating from these (structural) changes. For example, Bogataj and Krč (2014) highlighted the forest commons revival in Slovenia as a potential solution for improving the management of natural resources. A study on forest owner organizations (FOOs) in Eastern European countries (Weiss et al, 2012) showed that these organizations are established to support the restitution process, represent owners' interests in policy making processes and engage in forest management and marketing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific literature provides evidence of several initiatives and approaches that can be used to tackle managerial and organizational issues originating from these (structural) changes. For example, Bogataj and Krč (2014) highlighted the forest commons revival in Slovenia as a potential solution for improving the management of natural resources. A study on forest owner organizations (FOOs) in Eastern European countries (Weiss et al, 2012) showed that these organizations are established to support the restitution process, represent owners' interests in policy making processes and engage in forest management and marketing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies place attention on expected legislative amendments (Hafner, 2011a,b), while recent case-studies (Ogrin, 1989;Premrl, 2008;Šprajcar, 2012 and others) complement grey literature. However, the overall situation has only been addressed from geographical (Petek and Urbanc, 2007) and forestry (Ravtar, 1938;Bogataj, 1990;Bogataj and Krč, 2014) viewpoints.…”
Section: Research Methodology and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first identified factor underlying resilience is the harsh mountainous environment, a widely recognised driver for collective action, as poor resources and uncertainty reinforce cooperation (Anderies et al 2006, Bogataj & Krč 2014, Szántay 2015, thus, to reduce the high risks, rule-bound behaviour is particularly necessary (Folke et al 2007). Furthermore, as Agrawal & Yadama (1997) pointed out, the attributes of hill agriculture make commons the most effective system of resource use in this context, as poor soils and transportation difficulties hinder intensification and uniformization.…”
Section: Drivers For Resilience and Dismantlingmentioning
confidence: 99%