2004
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2004.838088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Finite Gilbert–Varshamov Bound for Pure Stabilizer Quantum Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
85
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to check that the reverse mapping also works. Note that an original code that exceeds the generic quantum Gilbert-Varshamov (GV) bound [35] is mapped to a CSS code that exceeds the version of the GV bound specific for such codes [33]. Also, an original sparse code is mapped to a sparse code, with the same limit on the column weight, and row weight at most doubled.…”
Section: Theorem 1 For Any Quantum Stabilizer Code [[Nkd]] With Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to check that the reverse mapping also works. Note that an original code that exceeds the generic quantum Gilbert-Varshamov (GV) bound [35] is mapped to a CSS code that exceeds the version of the GV bound specific for such codes [33]. Also, an original sparse code is mapped to a sparse code, with the same limit on the column weight, and row weight at most doubled.…”
Section: Theorem 1 For Any Quantum Stabilizer Code [[Nkd]] With Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 and 17 on L-chains and Corollary 3.1, we can also construct some new quantum codes of minimum distance 5. 17 There are the following L-chains: [14,8,5][14,13,2], [16,9,5] ⊆ [16,15,2], [18,12,5][18,17,2], [20,13,5] …”
Section: New Quantum Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum Hamming bound states (see [20,22]) that: Any pure ((n, K, d)) q stabilizer code satisfies…”
Section: Bounds On Quantum Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%