1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02728526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A field guide to the caecilians of the Western Ghats, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All amphibians were identified using the best available literature, and their nomenclature considered using the latest taxonomical authorities [ 6 , 26 , 69 , 77 85 ]. The classification of several of the taxa found in this study is still evolving.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All amphibians were identified using the best available literature, and their nomenclature considered using the latest taxonomical authorities [ 6 , 26 , 69 , 77 85 ]. The classification of several of the taxa found in this study is still evolving.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taxonomy morphology Balakrishna et al (1983) ma Reproduction Seshachar et al (1982) ma Reprroduction Inger & Dutta (1987) b, ma, p, s Distribution Nussbaum & Wilkinson (1989) b, ma, p, s Systematics Das & Whitaker (1990) p Distribution, habitat Andrews & George (1993) ma, p, s Checklist Krishnamurthy & Shakuntala (1993) b, ma Distribution Krishnamurthy (1996) b Distribution Daniels (1992) b, ma, p, s Distribution Bhatta (1997) ma Distribution, habitat Dutta (1997) b, ma, p, s Systematics, distribution Bhatta (1998) b, ma, p, s Systematics, distribution Das & Dutta (1998) b, ma, p, s Checklist Pillai & Ravichandran (1999) b, ma, p, s Systematics, distribution Bhatta (1999) m Feeding, reproduction Krishnamurthy & Hussain (2000) b Distribution Oommen et al (2000) cf. p Distribution Ravichandran & Krishnamurthy (2001) b, ma, p Systematics, distribution Chanda (2002) b, ma, p, s Systematics, distribution Ghate (2002) b, s Checklist Naik & Vinod (2002) b Conservation biology Venkatachalaiah & Venu (2002) m Karyology Gower et al (2002); [12] Bossuyt et al (2004) cf.…”
Section: Sample Numbers and Horizontal Line Between Samples 13 And 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Taylor (1960), Sarkar et al (1992), Dutta (1997), Bhatta (1998), Pillai and Ravichandran (1999), Anders et al (2002), Chanda (2002), Rai (2003), Kupfer and Müller (2004), Shah and Tiwari (2004), Kamei et al (2009), Wangyal (2014), Kamei and Biju (2016), and Kamei (2017), we identified them as Ichthyophis by being limbless and wormlike in general appearance and by having a short tentacle between the eye and nostril on each side of the head, small scales usually embedded in the skin, body with a series of annulations, and a short tail; and as I. sikkimensis by lacking a lateral stripe and having about 293-313 annuli, ten or fewer caudal folds, and 18-21 teeth on each dentary and 1-10 on each splenial with teeth not conspicuously sunken in pits. The identity of the species was confirmed by Prof. Karan Bahadur Shah.…”
Section: Reptiles and Amphibians C O N S E R V At I O N A N D N At U R A L H I S T O R Ymentioning
confidence: 99%