2017
DOI: 10.1108/rr-08-2016-0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Field Guide to the Reptiles of South-East Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
1
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
125
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, immature stages of moths were also collected and reared in the laboratory (Image 330) to confirm the species. The moths collected were photographed and subsequently identified using the reference collection at Kerala Forest Research Institute (KFRI) and available literature including Hampson (1892-1896), Bell & Scott (1937), Zimmerman (1978), Barlow (1982), Holloway (1983Holloway ( -2011, Robinson et al (1994), Kendrick (2002), Solovyev & Witt (2009), Mathew (2010), Irungbam et al (2017, Sondhi et al (2018), andSubhalaxmi (2018). Classification of moths at higher taxonomic levels was done based on Van Nieukerken et al (2011), and for nomenclature aspects at species and genus levels, LEPINDEX (Beccaloni et al 2003) was consulted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, immature stages of moths were also collected and reared in the laboratory (Image 330) to confirm the species. The moths collected were photographed and subsequently identified using the reference collection at Kerala Forest Research Institute (KFRI) and available literature including Hampson (1892-1896), Bell & Scott (1937), Zimmerman (1978), Barlow (1982), Holloway (1983Holloway ( -2011, Robinson et al (1994), Kendrick (2002), Solovyev & Witt (2009), Mathew (2010), Irungbam et al (2017, Sondhi et al (2018), andSubhalaxmi (2018). Classification of moths at higher taxonomic levels was done based on Van Nieukerken et al (2011), and for nomenclature aspects at species and genus levels, LEPINDEX (Beccaloni et al 2003) was consulted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the similarity matrices of community structure among habitat types from the breeding and nonbreeding seasons were highly correlated (Mantel test: point-counts, r = 0.81, P = 0.002; mist-nets, r = 0.92, P = 0.001), we combined data for the two seasons. Data on forest interior species and insectivores were extracted from Yang et al (1995), MacKinnon and Phillipps (2000), Robson (2000), and Yang and Yang (2004). Forest interior species were those reported to mainly occupy interior forests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a strong relationship between geographic range size and extinction risk (Figure 2), we did not include geographic range size in our analyses to avoid potential circularity with a species' IUCN threat status. Most of the data were extracted from a global dataset of avian ecological traits (Table 1; seeŞekercioglu et al, 2004, 2019 for more details of these methods and a description of this dataset) which compiled information from the literature, including ornithological books (e.g., Del Hoyo et al, 1992Kennedy et al, 2000), BirdLife International (2021), and field guides (e.g., Robson, 2000). Handwing index (HWI) data were taken from Sheard et al (2020).…”
Section: Dataset and Biological Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 99%