2021
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2021.3096942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fern Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna for Near-Field Microwave Imaging Medical Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gain (dBi) FF (%) Max. SAR (W/kg) Imaging system Detected tumor Tested phantom model 20 Antipodal Vivaldi 150 × 150 × 1.60 FR4 1 No 1.00–3.30, 106.97% 6.60 NP NP Single antenna, simulated One Semi realistic homogeneous 21 Microstrip 70 × 50 × 1.55 FR4 1 No 0.80–1.20, 40% NP NP NP Two antennas, Simulated One 3D plastic head model 22 Microstrip 64 × 42 × 1.60 FR4 1 No 1.40–2.52, 57.14% 3.5 80 0.300 Nine antennas, simulated One Simulated Hugo head model 24 Microstrip 32 × 24 × 1.60 FR4 1 Yes 0.75–1.60, 72.345 4.5 NP NP Twelve antennas, simulated One 3D SAM head phantom model 25 Microstrip …”
Section: Microwave Brain Imaging Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gain (dBi) FF (%) Max. SAR (W/kg) Imaging system Detected tumor Tested phantom model 20 Antipodal Vivaldi 150 × 150 × 1.60 FR4 1 No 1.00–3.30, 106.97% 6.60 NP NP Single antenna, simulated One Semi realistic homogeneous 21 Microstrip 70 × 50 × 1.55 FR4 1 No 0.80–1.20, 40% NP NP NP Two antennas, Simulated One 3D plastic head model 22 Microstrip 64 × 42 × 1.60 FR4 1 No 1.40–2.52, 57.14% 3.5 80 0.300 Nine antennas, simulated One Simulated Hugo head model 24 Microstrip 32 × 24 × 1.60 FR4 1 Yes 0.75–1.60, 72.345 4.5 NP NP Twelve antennas, simulated One 3D SAM head phantom model 25 Microstrip …”
Section: Microwave Brain Imaging Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different antennas have been offered to develop an MBI system to detect brain tumors. A fern antipodal Vivaldi antenna was proposed in 20 to detect brain tumor. The dimension of the antenna was 150 × 150 mm 2 , and the operating frequency was 1–3.3 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, Table 2 includes the comparison of the proposed AVA with best‐performing and recently reported AVAs. All AVAs reported in the Table 2, are of larger size as compared to the proposed AVA except the AVA designed in Reference 27, but it provides less gain and lower SLLs. Next, the AVAs implemented in References 14,17–26 gives better gain than the proposed AVA, but their dimensions are large, which render their use in the compact systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40] are of larger size than the proposed AVA-LC. Next, other AVAs designed by [41][42][43][44][45] are comparatively smaller in size, but their gains are lower than the proposed AVA-LC. Further, the antenna designed in [46] gives less gain and narrower bandwidth.…”
Section: Lens and Corrugation Designmentioning
confidence: 94%