2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Recent studies have shown that the effects of irrelevant spatial stimulus-response (S-R) correspondence (i.e., the Simon effect) occur only after trials in which the stimulus and response locations corresponded. This has been attributed to the gating of irrelevant information or the suppression of an automatic S-R route after experiencing a noncorresponding trial-a challenge to the widespread assumption of direct, intentionally unmediated links between spatial stimulus and response codes. However, trial sequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

36
636
11
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 588 publications
(685 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
36
636
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As an alternative to conflict-monitoring and cognitivecontrol accounts, it has been argued that the sequential modulation of congruency effects can be explained by partial mismatch/repetition costs (Braem et al, 2014;Egner, 2007;Hommel, Proctor, & Vu, 2004;U. Mayr, Awh, & Laurey, 2003).…”
Section: Conflict Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to conflict-monitoring and cognitivecontrol accounts, it has been argued that the sequential modulation of congruency effects can be explained by partial mismatch/repetition costs (Braem et al, 2014;Egner, 2007;Hommel, Proctor, & Vu, 2004;U. Mayr, Awh, & Laurey, 2003).…”
Section: Conflict Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the Simon effect, sequential effect analyses often show that the Simon effect is evident only for trials on which the previous trial was corresponding (e.g., Stürmer, Leuthold, Soetens, Schröter, & Sommer, 2002). This result has been interpreted as suggesting that the direct route is suppressed following a noncorresponding trial (Stürmer et al, 2002;Wühr, 2005; but see Hommel, Proctor, & Vu, 2004). If older adults are less capable than younger adults of dynamically suppressing and releasing suppression of the direct route on a trial-to-trial basis, then their sequential effects in the Simon task should be reduced.…”
Section: Mixed Mappings and Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical finding when investigating Simon compatibility effects, for example, is that the size of the Simon effect critically depends on the characteristics of the preceding trial. In particular, the sequential modulation effect reflects the finding that Simon effects in a current trial N are smaller following incompatible trials in N -1 compared to those following compatible trials in N -1 (Akçay & Hazeltine, 2007;Fischer, Dreisbach, & Goschke, 2008;Hommel, Proctor, & Vu, 2004;Notebaert, Soetens, & Melis, 2001;Stürmer, Leuthold, Soetens, Schröter, & Sommer, 2002;Wühr & Ansorge, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In binary choice tasks, such sequential modulation effects have often been explained in terms of bottom-up driven S-R feature repetitions and/or feature bindings (Hommel, 1998;Hommel et al, 2001Hommel et al, , 2004Nieuwenhuis, Stins, Posthuma, Polderman, Boomsma, & De Geus, 2006;Notebaert et al, 2001;Wendt, Kluwe, & Peters, 2006). 1 If a stimulus and the response to the stimulus co-occur in time, their features related to task-relevant stimulus or response dimensions are spontaneously integrated into a common event file comprising both stimulus-and response-related feature information such as form and position (Hommel et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation