2003
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.10083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility

Abstract: A fast calculation method for the magnetic field distribution due to (dynamic) changes in susceptibility may allow real-time interventional applications. Here it is shown that a direct relationship can be obtained between the magnetic field perturbation and the susceptibility distribution inside the MR magnet using a first order perturbation approach to Maxwell's magneto-static equations, combined with the Fourier transformation technique to solve partial derivative equations. The mathematical formalism does n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
394
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
394
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase imaging is known to depend not only on the shape of the different structures with different susceptibilities (Marques and Bowtell, 2005;Salomir et al, 2003;Schafer et al, 2009) but also on local microstructure (He and Yablonskiy, 2009), on local anisotropy of the magnetic susceptibility (Lee et al, 2010b;Liu, 2010) and even on nonsusceptibility mechanisms such as water exchange mechanisms (Luo et al, 2010;Shmueli et al, 2011;Zhong et al, 2011). In this study the phase shift observed locally between adjacent structures that remain geometrically unchanged during development was used to estimate myelination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phase imaging is known to depend not only on the shape of the different structures with different susceptibilities (Marques and Bowtell, 2005;Salomir et al, 2003;Schafer et al, 2009) but also on local microstructure (He and Yablonskiy, 2009), on local anisotropy of the magnetic susceptibility (Lee et al, 2010b;Liu, 2010) and even on nonsusceptibility mechanisms such as water exchange mechanisms (Luo et al, 2010;Shmueli et al, 2011;Zhong et al, 2011). In this study the phase shift observed locally between adjacent structures that remain geometrically unchanged during development was used to estimate myelination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While phase imaging offers an improved contrast between tissues, it should be taken into account that this information is non-local. It represents, at least to a large extent, the convolution of a magnetic susceptibility distribution with the magnetic field generated by magnetic dipole (Marques and Bowtell, 2005;Salomir et al, 2003). Such property makes the contrast observed between two tissues dependent on their orientation relatively to the main magnetic field and to extend beyond their boundaries (Schafer et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency shift map was calculated (Fig. 1b) using a method described in the context of MRI (14,15), in which the 3D fast Fourier transform (3DFFT) of the frequency offset is given by:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More theoretical work would need to be done for the complex geometry of the GP before an accurate quantification of iron spatial distribution and focal concentration could be made. Work describing a method that uses a first-order perturbation approach to Maxwell's magnetostatic equations, combined with the Fourier transformation technique for calculating magnetic field in the presence of an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility, offers promise that such a complex task could indeed be accomplished (38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%