2016
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw347
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast and powerfulW-test for pairwise epistasis testing

Abstract: Epistasis plays an essential role in the development of complex diseases. Interaction methods face common challenge of seeking a balance between persistent power, model complexity, computation efficiency, and validity of identified bio-markers. We introduce a novel W-test to identify pairwise epistasis effect, which measures the distributional difference between cases and controls through a combined log odds ratio. The test is model-free, fast, and inherits a Chi-squared distribution with data adaptive degrees… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, all formulations result in a χ 2 test statistic on k − 1 = 8 df (provided all cells are represented in the data), reflecting the fact that there are k − 1 additional independent parameters to be estimated under the alternative hypothesis (where the row and column variables are allowed to be associated) compared to the null hypothesis (where there is no association between the row and column variables). This contrasts with the W -test proposed by Wang et al 1 , in which k = 9 non-independent (log odds ratio) quantities are combined, resulting in the necessity for a scaled χ 2 test statistic (with parameters h and f estimated using bootstrapping) in order to account for the non-independence between the k = 9 normalized log odds ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, all formulations result in a χ 2 test statistic on k − 1 = 8 df (provided all cells are represented in the data), reflecting the fact that there are k − 1 additional independent parameters to be estimated under the alternative hypothesis (where the row and column variables are allowed to be associated) compared to the null hypothesis (where there is no association between the row and column variables). This contrasts with the W -test proposed by Wang et al 1 , in which k = 9 non-independent (log odds ratio) quantities are combined, resulting in the necessity for a scaled χ 2 test statistic (with parameters h and f estimated using bootstrapping) in order to account for the non-independence between the k = 9 normalized log odds ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In a paper recently published in the journal Nucleic Acids Research , Wang and colleagues 1 proposed a novel W -test for pairwise epistasis testing. The thrust of the proposed method was to compare the distributions of the k observed genotype combinations at L = 2 diallelic genetic loci such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), between cases and controls (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The W-test is a model-free statistic that measures the distributional differences of categorical variables between the affected and unaffected groups through a combined log of odds ratio (Wang et al, 2016). It can be used to test the main effect of a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) or epistasis of an SNP-pair.…”
Section: The W-testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies give h ≈ (k−1)/k and f ≈ k−1. Because the parameters are estimated from the data, they could reduce bias in testing probability distribution arose from complex data structures (Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: The W-testmentioning
confidence: 99%