2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4115-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dual response surface-desirability approach to process modeling and optimization of Al2O3 powder-mixed electrical discharge machining (PMEDM) parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an increase in pulse-on time increased the surface roughness significantly, whereas gap voltage increment had less effect on the surface roughness. This was justified by the previous studies [17][18][19][20]. Furthermore, higher pulseon time increased the plasma channel diameter which minimised both energy density and impulsive force.…”
Section: Effect On Average Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, an increase in pulse-on time increased the surface roughness significantly, whereas gap voltage increment had less effect on the surface roughness. This was justified by the previous studies [17][18][19][20]. Furthermore, higher pulseon time increased the plasma channel diameter which minimised both energy density and impulsive force.…”
Section: Effect On Average Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The reduction in impulsive force resulted in poor flushing of the melted debris which eventually formed a recast layer on the EDMed surface [2,21]. However, low pulse-on time with moderate peak current produced a plasma channel with higher energy density which can create a less rough surface [19,20].…”
Section: Effect On Average Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…relations of a system under study were known (e.g. Dabbas et al 2003;Henkenjohann et al 2005), or their regression equations can be calculated prior to the application of the desirability function (Assarzadeh and Ghoreishi 2013). Therefore, these approaches could not be applied if the process analytical model is unknown, which is usually the case for new, complex processes.…”
Section: Multiresponse Optimisation Based On Desirability Function Anmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The goal of optimization is to find a set of conditions that will meet all the goals. It is not important that the desirability value is 1.0 as the value is completely dependent on how closely the lower and upper limits are set relative to the actual optimum [43].…”
Section: Desirability Function (Df) Approach-mentioning
confidence: 99%