2009
DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-22-1-0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Draft Genome Sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato T1 Reveals a Type III Effector Repertoire Significantly Divergent from That of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000

Abstract: Diverse gene products including phytotoxins, pathogen-associated molecular patterns, and type III secreted effectors influence interactions between Pseudomonas syringae strains and plants, with additional yet uncharacterized factors likely contributing as well. Of particular interest are those interactions governing pathogen-host specificity. Comparative genomics of closely related pathogens with different host specificity represents an excellent approach for identification of genes contributing to host-range … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
102
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, DC3000 contains HopA1, and genome sequencing of P. syringae pv tomato strain T1 provides evidence for a hopA1 pseudogene (Almeida et al, 2009). This gene would encode a virtually identical HopA1 protein as in DC3000 except for a premature stop codon at amino acid position 55.…”
Section: Hopa1 Distribution In P Syringae Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, DC3000 contains HopA1, and genome sequencing of P. syringae pv tomato strain T1 provides evidence for a hopA1 pseudogene (Almeida et al, 2009). This gene would encode a virtually identical HopA1 protein as in DC3000 except for a premature stop codon at amino acid position 55.…”
Section: Hopa1 Distribution In P Syringae Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P. syringae species is divided into a large number of distinct pathovars based on the plant host from which a strain was originally isolated. This and the ease of molecular manipulation of this facultative bacterial plant pathogen has made P. syringae an important experimental system in the study of plant innate immunity, the effector complement of plant pathogens, and the evolution and genomics of host range (Fouts et al, 2002;Rohmer et al, 2004;Chang et al, 2005;Almeida et al, 2009). In particular, P. syringae pv tomato strain DC3000 (DC3000) and P. syringae pv maculicola strain 4326 were found to be pathogenic on Arabidopsis (Dong et al, 1991;Whalen et al, 1991) and were used to characterize effector genes from other P. syringae pathovars and cognate Arabidopsis R genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tomato DC3000 [4], P. syringae pv. tomato T1 [1], P. syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448A [21], P. syringae pv.…”
Section: Vol 191 2009 Achromobactin Biosynthesis By Pseudomonas Syrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As more bacterial species are sequenced, a draft sequence of genomes closely related to a finished reference genome will serve as a valuable resource for comparative analysis. Draft genome sequences have been used for rapid development of diagnostic tools, comparison of gene repertoires, and identification of putative virulence factors (2,4,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%