2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03650-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A double-spike MC TIMS measurement procedure for low-amount Ca isotopic analysis of limited biological tissue samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally the gold standard method for isotope ratio measurement, MC-TIMS, featured in a 42 Ca– 48 Ca double spike method to determine Ca isotope ratios in small tissue samples. 89 A low Ca blank of ≤10 ng, achieved through optimisation of the separation of Ca from the matrix and isobaric interferences using DGA resin, reduced the minimum mass of Ca required to 670 ng, which is equivalent to 2.3 μg bone material or 10 μL blood. The reported expanded uncertainty for the procedure for δ 44/40 Ca was 0.08‰.…”
Section: Progress With Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally the gold standard method for isotope ratio measurement, MC-TIMS, featured in a 42 Ca– 48 Ca double spike method to determine Ca isotope ratios in small tissue samples. 89 A low Ca blank of ≤10 ng, achieved through optimisation of the separation of Ca from the matrix and isobaric interferences using DGA resin, reduced the minimum mass of Ca required to 670 ng, which is equivalent to 2.3 μg bone material or 10 μL blood. The reported expanded uncertainty for the procedure for δ 44/40 Ca was 0.08‰.…”
Section: Progress With Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al suggested the use of a clean laboratory environment can allow for lower detection limits [ 9 ]. Retzmann et al described in detail how to minimize the Ca background and reported that, e.g., the use of nitrile gloves and clean-room wipes were major sources of Ca contamination and should be avoided [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%