1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01073583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discussion of the methods for comparing the relative effectiveness of phosphate fertilizers varying in solubility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
12

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
44
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative agronomic effectiveness index (AEI) was generated according to Chien et al (1990): T: treatment; SPA -Source of phosphorus added to alkaline biosolid; PAP -Par tially acidulated phosphate rock Alvorada; SSP -Single superphosphate; TSP -Triple superphosphate; LPA -Level of phosphorus added to alkaline biosolid; TD -Total dose, per recipient, of alkaline biosolid added by phosphorus (considered a soil density = 1.000 g cm -3 ); PAB -Quantity of pure alkaline biosolid in the mixture of phosphorus added; QS -Quantity of phosphorus source in the mixture of P added to supply the test-dose of 45.85 kg of P (105 kg ha -1 of P 2 O 5 ) recommended for 1.0 ha -1 (2000000 kg soil of the first 20 cm of soil) from each treatment (considered a soil density = 1.000 g cm -3 ); DP -Dose of phosphorus recommended for one hectare (2000000 kg of the first 20 cm of soil), equivalent to 105 kg ha -1 of P 2 O 5 considered a soil density of 1.000 g cm -3 ) where: AEI-Relative agronomic effectiveness index, % Yn -Total dry mass production of aerial part of bean plants obtained with the treatments related to the levels of 0.436, 0.872, 1.745 dag kg -1 of P added (PAP and SSP) to alkaline biosolid; Y 2 -Total dry mass production of aerial part of bean plants obtained with the treatments related to the levels of 0.436, 0.872, 1.745 dag kg -1 of P added from the triple superphosphate, taken as a reference source of P added to alkaline biosolid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative agronomic effectiveness index (AEI) was generated according to Chien et al (1990): T: treatment; SPA -Source of phosphorus added to alkaline biosolid; PAP -Par tially acidulated phosphate rock Alvorada; SSP -Single superphosphate; TSP -Triple superphosphate; LPA -Level of phosphorus added to alkaline biosolid; TD -Total dose, per recipient, of alkaline biosolid added by phosphorus (considered a soil density = 1.000 g cm -3 ); PAB -Quantity of pure alkaline biosolid in the mixture of phosphorus added; QS -Quantity of phosphorus source in the mixture of P added to supply the test-dose of 45.85 kg of P (105 kg ha -1 of P 2 O 5 ) recommended for 1.0 ha -1 (2000000 kg soil of the first 20 cm of soil) from each treatment (considered a soil density = 1.000 g cm -3 ); DP -Dose of phosphorus recommended for one hectare (2000000 kg of the first 20 cm of soil), equivalent to 105 kg ha -1 of P 2 O 5 considered a soil density of 1.000 g cm -3 ) where: AEI-Relative agronomic effectiveness index, % Yn -Total dry mass production of aerial part of bean plants obtained with the treatments related to the levels of 0.436, 0.872, 1.745 dag kg -1 of P added (PAP and SSP) to alkaline biosolid; Y 2 -Total dry mass production of aerial part of bean plants obtained with the treatments related to the levels of 0.436, 0.872, 1.745 dag kg -1 of P added from the triple superphosphate, taken as a reference source of P added to alkaline biosolid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…providing P for maize plants, being less than 30% as effective as TSP applied at the same rate (using a vertical comparison of Mnkeni et al (2000) at 20 kg P ha -1 ). Substitution ratio or Horizontal comparison (using the equation of Chien et al 1990) suggests that by the time maize had reached silking stage, FYM and Tithonia were only 15 and 30% as effective as TSP.…”
Section: Effect Of P Fertilizers On Maize Yield-yearmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The substitution ratio (SR) of P fertilizer was compared by calculating the amount of reference fertilizer required to produce same yield response (Chien et al 1990). The substitution ratio of P fertilizer is known as horizontal comparison of fertilizers and this is calculated using the following equation.…”
Section: Soil and Herbage Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression ranks the P sources with respect to FMC according to their agronomic potential to produce a yield response (Chien et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%