2009
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dictionary to identify small molecules and drugs in free text

Abstract: The combined dictionary is freely available as an XML file in Simple Knowledge Organization System format on the web site http://www.biosemantics.org/chemlist.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
131
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
131
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are worse than that reported by Oscar3 [Corbett and Murray-Rust 2006]. Hettne, et al, [Hettne et al 2009] of 45%, recall of 82% and an F-measure of 58%. These numbers are similar to our observations.…”
Section: Chemical Entity Taggingcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…These observations are worse than that reported by Oscar3 [Corbett and Murray-Rust 2006]. Hettne, et al, [Hettne et al 2009] of 45%, recall of 82% and an F-measure of 58%. These numbers are similar to our observations.…”
Section: Chemical Entity Taggingcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…They used predictions of their improved version of the ChemSpot tool 2 (Rocktäschel et al, 2012) and features derived from (i) Jochem 3 , a dictionary for the identification of small molecules and drugs in text (Hettne et al, 2009), (ii) the PHARE ontology (Coulet et al, 2011) and (iii) the ChEBI ontology (de Matos et al, 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have exploited available terminological resources 2 such as UMLS [4], JoChem [5], PIR Biothesaurus [6], PIR iProClass [7] or InterPro [8] (see Figure 1) to provide correspondences between the given entity identifiers. Note that, the impact of UMLS has been important in the normalization of DISO and SPE entity identifiers, whilst PIR, InterPro and JoChem in the normalization of CHED and PRGE.…”
Section: Terminological Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%