My paper, 'A Dialectical Reading of Dynamic Systems Theory: Transcending Socialized Cognition and Cognized Social Dualism in L2 Studies' (Karimi-Aghdam, 2016), is developed with a twofold purpose: to attempt an immanent critique of the received interpretation of dynamic systems theory (DST) 1 -labelled contextual DST-where I show that, in its extant L2 studies formulation, DST is essentially a deficient approach; and to suggest an alternative construal of DST-termed dialectical DST-where I purport to make a small contribution to theorizing a comprehensive, integrative, and unified conceptual framework to understand, describe, explain, and optimize the systematic changes of an L2 learner's multifaceted language cognizance, and the psychological and sociocultural processes and mechanisms engendering and underlying those changes. My paper ( 2016) is about DST, but the longstanding division between the social and cognitive dimensions of L2