2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decade of engineering-to-order (2010–2020): Progress and emerging themes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate stronger need on capturing and modelling design knowledge (Wang and Duffy, 2007), design reasoning patterns (Mämmelä et al, 2020), design decision sequences (Halonen et al, 2014), and design reasoning paths (Pakkanen et al, 2021). Cannas and Gosling defined the 'new product development improvement' for managing engineering and manufacturing in ETO context (Cannas and Gosling, 2021;Gosling and Naim, 2009). This can be now extended to study how practitioners use many information sources and knowledge assets (if available) when reaching for artefact synthesis within the project delivery without NPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results indicate stronger need on capturing and modelling design knowledge (Wang and Duffy, 2007), design reasoning patterns (Mämmelä et al, 2020), design decision sequences (Halonen et al, 2014), and design reasoning paths (Pakkanen et al, 2021). Cannas and Gosling defined the 'new product development improvement' for managing engineering and manufacturing in ETO context (Cannas and Gosling, 2021;Gosling and Naim, 2009). This can be now extended to study how practitioners use many information sources and knowledge assets (if available) when reaching for artefact synthesis within the project delivery without NPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alfnes et al studied systemic factors creating uncertainty in complex engineer-to-order supply chains (Alfnes et al, 2021). The lack of ETO context in supply chain research agenda in identified (Gosling and Naim, 2009a) and later Cannas et al identify three major emerging themes in this field; 1) ETO definitions through conceptualisation of the engineering flows 2) strategies for decoupling positioning, design automation and engineering management in ETO situations; 3) applicability of lean within ETO situations (Cannas and Gosling, 2021). Willner et al propose four distinct archetypes of ETO (complex, basic, repeatable, and noncompetitive).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ETO supply chain research emerged in the 1980s but is now becoming a coherent body of knowledge for those interested in managing highly customized engineering solutions (Cannas and Gosling 2021). Bertrand and Muntslag (1993) categorized the supply chain into four groups: Make-to-Stock, Assemble-to-Order, Make-to-Order, and ETO supply chains.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Eto Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason to place our focus on SD and CT is that, while there have been more general ETO supply chain literature reviews (Gosling and Naim 2009;Cannas and Gosling 2021), there has been no review conducted focused on those specific methods. After preliminary research, we found those systems-based approaches are widely used in both fields, hence potentially providing a bridge for knowledge sharing between Project Management (PM) and Supply Chain Management (SCM).…”
Section: Materials Collection and Analysis Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation