2008
DOI: 10.1002/humu.20907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A database to support the interpretation of human mismatch repair gene variants

Abstract: Germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 can cause Lynch syndrome. This syndrome, also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is an autosomal dominantly‐inherited disorder predominantly characterized by colorectal and endometrial cancer. Truncating MMR gene mutations generally offer a clear handle for genetic counseling and allow for presymptomatic testing. In contrast, the clinical implications of most missense mutations and small in‐frame deletions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probabilities calculated were then classified in five classes, following the guidelines of the Special Issue of Human Mutation. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] An increasing number of groups are trying to classify UVs using these recommendations, but most of them focus on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, for which a multifactorial likelihood classification has already been developed and refined. Instead, for MMR genes, there are not well-established models or well-characterized features 42 so that, at the time of writing, a very few groups have attempted to classify MMR UVs with the Bayesian likelihood method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…The probabilities calculated were then classified in five classes, following the guidelines of the Special Issue of Human Mutation. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] An increasing number of groups are trying to classify UVs using these recommendations, but most of them focus on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, for which a multifactorial likelihood classification has already been developed and refined. Instead, for MMR genes, there are not well-established models or well-characterized features 42 so that, at the time of writing, a very few groups have attempted to classify MMR UVs with the Bayesian likelihood method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…The nine novel DNA variants were not detected in the 100 healthy controls (Table 2). To verify the pathogenicity of the novel variants, we used a combination of computational and segregation analyses, as described in our previous studies [7,21]. The results are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…As shown in Table 1, 27 germline variants were identified in MSH6, nine of which were novel variants not previously reported in the NCBI SNP database, the Human Gene Mutation Database (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php), the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors (InSight; http://www.insightgroup.org/) or the MMR variants database [21]. MSI analysis was performed for all patients with available paraffin-embedded tumor tissues; these results are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…All articles mentioning MLH1 K618A listed in the InSIGHT mismatch repair gene variant database 8 and the Mismatch Repair Gene Unclassified Variant Database 8 were reviewed. A PubMed search yielded several additional references.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the cancer susceptibility of individuals and families identified with MLH1 K618A is not understood. 8 In the present study, we evaluated more precisely the role of MLH1 K618A in predisposition to cancer. We genotyped 1512 control subjects to assess the frequency of this variant in the general population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%