2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A crude protective film on historic stones and its artificial preparation through biomimetic synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these traditional materials can be easily cleaned out as compared to the organic polymers. Some findings regarding the application of a crude biomimetic protective film on stone buildings and sculptures have also been reported (Liu et al, 2006b). These findings could not only lead to the development of new protective methods or ideas concerning stone conservation, but also contribute toward new researches into biomineralisation or biocontrolled processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, these traditional materials can be easily cleaned out as compared to the organic polymers. Some findings regarding the application of a crude biomimetic protective film on stone buildings and sculptures have also been reported (Liu et al, 2006b). These findings could not only lead to the development of new protective methods or ideas concerning stone conservation, but also contribute toward new researches into biomineralisation or biocontrolled processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Coating stone is an effective way to protect stone-built cultural relics from damage [10]. The coating materials can be divided into two categories: organic and inorganic [11]. Organic coating materials have demonstrated excellent hydrophobicity, weather resistance, acid resistance, and salt corrosion resistance [12][13][14]; however, they can easily turn yellow, age, and show other negative effects on cultural heritage, thus reducing the protection timespan [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of materials that have been tried as stone conservation materials have been organic polymers [3,4], but several inorganic materials deserve a particular mention, as their mode of operation is rather different. Among them, biomimetic or biocontrolled protective materials have been represented as a new prospect in stone conservation because of their unique featuresuniform size, novel crystal morphology, specific crystallographic orientation, light weight, mechanical robustness and unique functions, as well as compatibility [5]. By comparison, these organic materials, including epoxies, acrylics, alkoxysilanes, silicones and fluorine-containing polymers, have some inadequacies and defects: shorter life, poorer compatibility, and change of the face of the treated stones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%