2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02251-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-sectional study of knowledge, attitudes, barriers and practices of cervical cancer screening among nurses in selected hospitals in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

Abstract: Background Cervical cancer is a preventable but highly prevalent cancer in many low -and middle-income countries including South Africa. Cervical cancer outcomes can be improved with improved vaccination, a well-coordinated and efficient screening programme, increased community awareness and uptake, and increased knowledge and advocacy of health professionals. This study therefore aimed to ascertain the knowledge, attitudes, practices and barriers of cervical cancer screening among nurses of se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 36 studies which focused on cancer, 12 were on breast cancer [ 26 36 ], 22 on cervical cancer [ 37 57 ], one on cancer generally [ 58 ] and one on oral cancer [ 59 ]. Studies on cervical cancer were focused on nurse-led screening and treatment of human papillomavirus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 36 studies which focused on cancer, 12 were on breast cancer [ 26 36 ], 22 on cervical cancer [ 37 57 ], one on cancer generally [ 58 ] and one on oral cancer [ 59 ]. Studies on cervical cancer were focused on nurse-led screening and treatment of human papillomavirus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coverage of cervical cancer prevention programs in South Africa remains low, reflecting challenges with resource allocation for screening, diagnosis, and access to adequate care ( 17 , 18 ), in addition to individual and societal barriers such as lack of awareness and misconceptions of cervical cancer ( 19 21 ). Barriers to effective scale-up persist at each step of the current South African multi-visit standard of care, in which women undergo cytology screening and are required to return to the clinic multiple times for results, triage, and pre-cancer treatment, if necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers to effective scale-up persist at each step of the current South African multi-visit standard of care, in which women undergo cytology screening and are required to return to the clinic multiple times for results, triage, and pre-cancer treatment, if necessary. First, widespread implementation of cytology and triage demands critical infrastructure, equipment, and adequately trained personnel in clinics and laboratories, all of which are lean in-country in the public-sector healthcare network ( 1 , 2 , 21 , 22 ). Meeting supply and cold chain requirements for cryotherapy treatment of cervical lesions proves challenging ( 23 ), and the need for multiple clinic visits results in notable loss to follow-up ( 23 , 24 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the general South African population, limited awareness and knowledge about cervical cancer, its risk factors, and the available prevention measures contribute to low screening coverage and high cervical cancer burden [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. This is not only limited to the South African population but seems to be the norm in other sub-Saharan countries where knowledge about cervical cancer has similarly been reported to be poor [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common for men to have poor knowledge of and misperceptions about cervical cancer prevention and other women's health issues; yet, men in sub-Saharan Africa control the economic resources and make most health-related decisions for their families and population [25][26][27][28]. South African primary healthcare workers have been reported to have inadequate knowledge about cervical cancer prevention and treatment services, which may result in them giving low-quality health education to individual patients and communities around public health facilities [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%