2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0929-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cost-effectiveness analysis of genomic sequencing in a prospective versus historical cohort of complex pediatric patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commitment to make WES a frontline analysis is not new 31. On one hand, it has already been shown that WES can be much more efficient than traditional methods in terms of diagnostic rates as well as cost-effectiveness 32. On the other hand, WES has already shown its superiority against some routine genetic analyses such as gene panels and single gene testing 28 33.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commitment to make WES a frontline analysis is not new 31. On one hand, it has already been shown that WES can be much more efficient than traditional methods in terms of diagnostic rates as well as cost-effectiveness 32. On the other hand, WES has already shown its superiority against some routine genetic analyses such as gene panels and single gene testing 28 33.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs of standard diagnostic care for children were estimated by pooling estimates from studies that evaluated ES in patients without a diagnosis after standard workup and reported mean follow up of standard diagnosis. 20,32,34,35 Costs for infants were based on the study by Stark et al 15 and were converted to US dollars from Australian dollars or Euros. In both cases, we assumed that patients would continue to receive diagnostic tests as long as they were undiagnosed.…”
Section: Costs Of Diagnostic Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although long-term management was not included in this analysis, given the significant cost savings observed in children, these savings are unlikely to be offset by future management costs among a proportion of children for whom ES demonstrates clinical utility. 51 When comparing genomic approaches, integrating ES with targeted analysis early in the diagnostic pathway is the most cost-effective genomic approach. ES should be prioritized over conventional panels due to similarities in cost and greater diagnostic yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research that considers the long-term clinical implications of genomic testing across all Genetic Kidney Disease is required to establish the cost-effectiveness of genomic investigations in kidney disease. 51…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%