2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2021.3082421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Consensus Equilibrium Approach for 3-D Land Seismic Shots Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DSPRecon method was originally designed for trace reconstruction, nonetheless, for a fair comparison with the DIPsgr method, we transpose the seismic cube to work in the common-receiver-gather domain and recover the shot-gathers for every single receiver line, i.e., recovering the seismic shot-gathers for every single receiver array. The third method is the consensus equilibrium (CE) approach [21] that incorporates several regularizes in the optimization problem for recovering missing shot-gathers. Given that the CE approach outperforms the sparsity-based methods (see [21]), this paper disregards that comparison.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The DSPRecon method was originally designed for trace reconstruction, nonetheless, for a fair comparison with the DIPsgr method, we transpose the seismic cube to work in the common-receiver-gather domain and recover the shot-gathers for every single receiver line, i.e., recovering the seismic shot-gathers for every single receiver array. The third method is the consensus equilibrium (CE) approach [21] that incorporates several regularizes in the optimization problem for recovering missing shot-gathers. Given that the CE approach outperforms the sparsity-based methods (see [21]), this paper disregards that comparison.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third method is the consensus equilibrium (CE) approach [21] that incorporates several regularizes in the optimization problem for recovering missing shot-gathers. Given that the CE approach outperforms the sparsity-based methods (see [21]), this paper disregards that comparison.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several research works have proposed to optimize seismic acquisition geometries based on data reconstruction. These traditional model-driven methods include concepts from the area of compressive sensing [2,3,4], the use of low-rank [5,6,7], and sparsity-based [8,9,10] optimization algorithms for the reconstruction of seismic traces (missing receivers) and shots (missing sources). A fundamental requirement to implement model-driven methods in geophysics is the sparsity that presumes the data is sparse under certain transforms or the low-rank that supposes the data contains redundancies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%