Proceedings of the ACM First Workshop on CyberInfrastructure: Information Management in eScience 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1317353.1317360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual modeling and execution framework for process based scientific applications

Abstract: In recent years, scientists are dealing more and more with data intensive and complex applications. Many scientific workflow systems emerged which adapt technology and methods stemming from the workflow management area and that should support scientists in understanding and working with their complex scenarios. However as these systems often descend from problem solving environments, many of them are missing a well structured conceptual method for process modeling and execution as a foundation. In this publica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In POPM notion each issue of the domain is handled and modeled by a separate perspective. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss i>PM and POPM but it is worthy to mention here that in our previous publications [16,17], we have demonstrated various advantages of POPM approach towards scientific workflows. We define scientific workflow as a set of work steps connected through control flow link.…”
Section: Scientific Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In POPM notion each issue of the domain is handled and modeled by a separate perspective. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss i>PM and POPM but it is worthy to mention here that in our previous publications [16,17], we have demonstrated various advantages of POPM approach towards scientific workflows. We define scientific workflow as a set of work steps connected through control flow link.…”
Section: Scientific Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%