2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-009-0688-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual framework for the study of modular responses to local environmental heterogeneity within the plant crown and a review of related concepts

Abstract: Plants respond to local heterogeneity in abiotic and biotic conditions by changing module-level morphology, growth, and reproductive patterns. This paper presents a conceptual framework for the study of modular responses in plant crowns, clarifies the points that should be considered for scaling up from modular responses to the consequences at the whole-plant level, characterizes the interspecific differences in modular response patterns, and discusses their ecological significance. The modular response was de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(129 reference statements)
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the development of branching patterns in extant woody plants is a complex physiological process that remains inadequately understood [12][13][14]. Previous studies show that living plants respond to local heterogeneity in both abiotic and biotic conditions by changing module-level morphology, growth, and reproductive patterns [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the development of branching patterns in extant woody plants is a complex physiological process that remains inadequately understood [12][13][14]. Previous studies show that living plants respond to local heterogeneity in both abiotic and biotic conditions by changing module-level morphology, growth, and reproductive patterns [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) rather than modular units that are autonomous with respect to their responses to local conditions (Kawamura 2010). This could provide a more mechanistic understanding of how different strategies of crown development contribute to species coexistence in mixed stands.…”
Section: Implications For Predicting Stand Development In Mixed-specimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions exclude any preferential allocation, neither due to proximity [18] nor due to growth strategy [20]. No references were found about the biomass partitioning between primary and secondary growth at whole-tree scale.…”
Section: Lnggu I (9a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All lateral axes borne by the same Gu remain equal during the simulation, despite biological knowledge about vigor gradients [26] or asymmetric allocation depending of axis local environment [20].…”
Section: B Limits Due To Draft Modelling Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%