2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3075159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Review of Crop Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches With Special Emphasis on Palm Oil Yield Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
(207 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More overfitting issues often complicates general machine learning models. Intensive network structure optimization may address the issues of the local minima and overriding by DNNs [ 80 , 81 ]. Deep learning is a machine learning-based approach that educates computers to accomplish tasks similar to those performed by humans.…”
Section: Significant Research Work On Hand Gesture Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More overfitting issues often complicates general machine learning models. Intensive network structure optimization may address the issues of the local minima and overriding by DNNs [ 80 , 81 ]. Deep learning is a machine learning-based approach that educates computers to accomplish tasks similar to those performed by humans.…”
Section: Significant Research Work On Hand Gesture Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review does not mention algorithms for predicting palm oil yields and breeding. [44] An overview of existing ML models for predicting crop yields. Various performance metrics are employed to assess the effectiveness of various strategies.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, ML features are reviewed for automatic fruit grading with the help of image processing [23]. Recently, Rashid et al reviewed ML application for yield prediction of different crops, including oil palm [24]. From the reviewed literature, it is observed that present studies did not systematically search the literature in most cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%