1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb02357.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
444
0
8

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,170 publications
(466 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
444
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Both in 2000-2001 and in 2005-2006, trained psychiatric research nurses performed the semistructured neuropsychiatric examinations that included ratings of the past month's psychiatric signs and symptoms according to Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (Asberg et al, 1978), which is valid and reliable in elderly populations (van der Laan et al, 2005), and Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Sheehan et al, 1998), history of depression, and assessment of current medications. Ratings of common signs and symptoms of dementia were also carried out (eg, assessments of memory, orientation, general knowledge, apraxia, visuospatial function, understanding proverbs, following commands, naming ability, and language) and have been described in detail (Guo et al, 2007;Skoog et al, 1993).…”
Section: Neuropsychiatric Examinations and Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both in 2000-2001 and in 2005-2006, trained psychiatric research nurses performed the semistructured neuropsychiatric examinations that included ratings of the past month's psychiatric signs and symptoms according to Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (Asberg et al, 1978), which is valid and reliable in elderly populations (van der Laan et al, 2005), and Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Sheehan et al, 1998), history of depression, and assessment of current medications. Ratings of common signs and symptoms of dementia were also carried out (eg, assessments of memory, orientation, general knowledge, apraxia, visuospatial function, understanding proverbs, following commands, naming ability, and language) and have been described in detail (Guo et al, 2007;Skoog et al, 1993).…”
Section: Neuropsychiatric Examinations and Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale steps are as follows: 0 = memory as usual, 2 = occasional increased lapses of memory, 4 = reports of socially inconvenient or disturbing loss of memory, 6 = complaints of complete inability to remember. 25 A physician, an ECT nurse, or other professional who was involved in administering the ECT treatment recorded the score based on the patients' subjective report. Subjective memory worsening was operationally defined as a worsening of at least 2 points (eg, from 2 to 4) on the item score from within 1 week before to within 1 week after treatment.…”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The CPRS compromises 65 items and was developed during the 1970s for evaluation of psychiatric treatment effects. It has high reliability 26 and can be used in full or as an "item pool," for example, the MontgomeryÅsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which consists of 10 items from the CPRS.…”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoking intensity parameters included pack-years and Fagerstrom test of nicotine dependence score. The baseline measurement of depression and anxiety symptoms on the second day of admission were based on the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) (Asberg et al, 1978). Withdrawal intensity was evaluated using the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment-Alcohol revised (CIWAAr) Scale approximately every 2-4 h while awake for the first 3-5 days after admission.…”
Section: Human Association Studymentioning
confidence: 99%