2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020jd032996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison on the E‐Change Pulses Occurring in the Bi‐Level Polarity‐Opposite Charge Regions of the Intracloud Lightning Flashes

Abstract: We have compared the E‐change pulses occurring in the upper positive charge region (UPCR) and the middle negative charge region (MNCR) of 41 normal intracloud (IC) flashes. E‐change pulses can be roughly grouped into isolated pulses and pulse trains with both positive and negative polarities. Although isolated pulses occurred about equally in UPCR and MNCR, there were much more pulse trains in MNCR than UPCR. Overall, the average amplitude, rise time, half‐peak width, and fall time of isolated pulses (pulse tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better understand such a difference, Figure 13 shows the spatiotemporal distributions of all located sources, along with the upper and the lower heights of 95 well-mapped PB processes, for an isolated summer thunderstorm observed also by FALMA in Gifu, Japan [17,23]. All the PB processes belonged to IC flashes and propagated upward with their lowest sources at the height of around −10 • C and highest sources at around −40 • C. As has been reported recently, PB processes are a type of negative leader (see, e.g., [23,24]); such types of upward PB progressions indicate that the main negative charge in the thundercloud is at a height of around −10 • C (at a lower height) and the main positive charge is at a height of around −40 • C (at an upper height). This is a typical charge structure for summer thunderstorms in lowland areas.…”
Section: Discussion On the Possible Charge Structuresupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To better understand such a difference, Figure 13 shows the spatiotemporal distributions of all located sources, along with the upper and the lower heights of 95 well-mapped PB processes, for an isolated summer thunderstorm observed also by FALMA in Gifu, Japan [17,23]. All the PB processes belonged to IC flashes and propagated upward with their lowest sources at the height of around −10 • C and highest sources at around −40 • C. As has been reported recently, PB processes are a type of negative leader (see, e.g., [23,24]); such types of upward PB progressions indicate that the main negative charge in the thundercloud is at a height of around −10 • C (at a lower height) and the main positive charge is at a height of around −40 • C (at an upper height). This is a typical charge structure for summer thunderstorms in lowland areas.…”
Section: Discussion On the Possible Charge Structuresupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The large observed percentage of the downward PB processes (August 2nd: 93%, 287/310; August 5th: 96%, 318/332) indicates that the charge structures of the thunderclouds were generally different from the ordinary summer thunderstorms in lowland areas (e.g., in [23,24]). To better understand such a difference, Figure 13 shows the spatiotemporal distributions of all located sources, along with the upper and the lower heights of 95 well-mapped PB processes, for an isolated summer thunderstorm observed also by FALMA in Gifu, Japan [17,23].…”
Section: Discussion On the Possible Charge Structurementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When a discharge is progressing in a region with space charge, it usually involves many branches (e.g., Mazur et al, 1998). So, we speculate that the discharge features observed in this paper should be very common in lightning discharges inside clouds and the connection processes involved could produce the isolated E-change pulses with various rise times as observed by Shi et al (2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%