2004
DOI: 10.3161/068.039.0107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Two European Breeding Habitats of the Water RailRallus aquaticus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results confirmed at the landscape scale what has been already found at the local scale for the Water Rail: the key importance of reed-bed habitats and the secondary importance of other herbaceous vegetation, which are likely to substitute reed-bed where it is lacking (Brambilla & Rubolini 2004), have been reported from other studies carried out at small spatial scales and using fine variables measured in the field (Jenkins & Ormerod 2002, Brambilla & Rubolini 2004, De Kroon 2004.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our results confirmed at the landscape scale what has been already found at the local scale for the Water Rail: the key importance of reed-bed habitats and the secondary importance of other herbaceous vegetation, which are likely to substitute reed-bed where it is lacking (Brambilla & Rubolini 2004), have been reported from other studies carried out at small spatial scales and using fine variables measured in the field (Jenkins & Ormerod 2002, Brambilla & Rubolini 2004, De Kroon 2004.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The water rail Rallus aquaticus remains a poorly studied bird species due to its elusive life and the difficulties to penetrate its habitat (De Kroon 2004;Polak 2005). Based on sequences of three loci (COI, ADH5 and PTPN12), the water rail has been split into two separate species, R. aquaticus and R. indicus, the former occurring from Western Europe to Kazakhstan and the latter in East Asia including Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Little Crake and Water Rail occupy a wide range of freshwater, usually eutrophic wetlands (natural and semi-natural), with fairly tall and dense aquatic vegetation (Cramp 1980, Taylor & Van Perlo 1998. A few recent studies have investigated landscape and spatial determinants of Water Rail occurrence or abundance (Jenkins & Ormerod 2002, Brambilla & Rubolini 2004, Brambilla et al 2012, but small-scale nest-site preferences of both species are poorly known (Schiermann 1929, Kux 1959, De Kroon 2000, De Kroon & Mommers 2002, De Kroon 2004, although water depth at nest sites has been reported to vary between the two species, with Water Rail nesting in shallower places than Little Crake (Bauer 1960). Nevertheless, virtually no study has quantitatively analysed which habitat features are most likely to drive nest-site selection in these two secretive species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%