2003
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2003.1178878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three artificial life techniques for reporting cell planning in mobile computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mostly these costs are assumed to be constant for all LM schemes. So combination of LU and paging cost are considered to be sufficient to compare different LM schemes [1], [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Location Management Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mostly these costs are assumed to be constant for all LM schemes. So combination of LU and paging cost are considered to be sufficient to compare different LM schemes [1], [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Location Management Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Location management (LM) involves tracking of MT's up-to-date location, which moves freely across different cells in order to provide it services. Two basic operations in LM are: Location Update (LU) and Paging [1][2][3][4]. Costs of these two operations are negatively correlated so it is very difficult but necessary to provide good tradeoff between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is obvious that dynamic schemes are much more complex than static ones and require more computation capabilities in the network. Thus, implementing static schemes is more popular [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Nevertheless, a static location update strategy must use minimum network resources to manage user tracking and should not require massive computations as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a static location update strategy must use minimum network resources to manage user tracking and should not require massive computations as well. Always update strategies, never update strategies, time based strategies, movement based strategies, distance based strategies, paging cells schemes, and location areas schemes can be mentioned as the most common techniques used for static location updating [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%