A Comparison of the CMM and Measuring Scanner for Printing Products Geometry Measurement

Softić, Almira; Bašić, Hazim; Baljić, Kenan

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75275-0_34

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since these methods can measure only specific geometry, particular purpose, and high-precision metrological instruments for in situ , more-complex structure monitoring are mandatory. For example, some industries have adopted coordinate measurement machines (CMMs) with high precision contact probe-based measurement systems (e.g., Zeiss Contura G2). , These machines compared the measurement deviation of the fabricated part with the actual CAD design to assess the printed product precision and quality. However, since these are contact-based, there is a need for a fixture that makes the process slow and nonportable.…”

Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intrinsic Field-Induced Nanoparticle Assembly in Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Polymeric Composites

Ravichandran

Jambhulkar

et al. 2021

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nanoparticles (NPs) are materials considered to be 1–100 nm in size and are available in different dimensional shapes, geometrical sizes, physical morphologies, mechanical robustness, and chemical compositions. Irrespective of the dimensions (i.e., zero-dimensional (0D), one-dimensional (1D), and two-dimensional (2D)), NPs have a tendency to become entangled together, forming aggregations due to high attraction, making it hard to realize their full potential from their ordered counterparts. Many challenges exist to attain high-quality stabilized dispersion and long-range ordered assembly of NPs. Three-dimensional printing (3DP), also known as additive manufacturing (AM), is a technique dependent on layer-by-layer material addition for building 3D structures and encompasses a few categories based on the feedstock material types and printing mechanisms. One benefit from the 3DP procedures is their capability to produce anisotropic microstructural/nanostructural characteristics for desired mechanical reinforcement, transport phenomena, energy management, and biomedical implants. This paper briefly overviews relevant 3DP methods with an embedded nature to assemble nanoparticles without interference with external fields (e.g., magnetic or electrical). Our focus is the shear-field-induced nanoparticle alignment, covering material jetting-, electrohydrodynamic-, filament melting-, and ink writing-based 3DP. A concise summary of photopolymerization and its “optical tweezer” effects on nanoparticle confinement also inspires creative approaches in generating ordered nanostructures. The nanoparticles and polymers involved in this review are diverse, consisting of metallic, ceramic, and carbon nanoparticles in matrices or on surfaces of varying macromolecules. A short statement of challenges (e.g., low resolution, slow printing speed, limited material options) for 3DP-enabled nanoparticle orders provides some perspectives toward the enormous potential of 3DP in directing NPs assembly and fabricating high-performance polymer/nanoparticle composites.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intrinsic Field-Induced Nanoparticle Assembly in Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Polymeric Composites

Ravichandran

Jambhulkar

et al. 2021

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is distinguished by its remarkable measurement speed as well as technological intuitiveness. However, it has its limitations [14], such as the requirement for adequate illumination of the sample under examination; for example, if it has deep narrow holes, errors in the virtual model and inaccurate representation of the geometry are possible. Another important aspect of the scanning method is that it is a non-contact measurement, which prevents potential changes in the surface of the measured sample, although there may be larger deviations created in the intermediate stages and the performance of 3D model fitting [15][16][17][18][19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimating the Uncertainty of Measurements for Various Methods and 3D Printed Parts

Kozior,

Bochnia,

Bochenek

et al. 2024

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the results of a study on the dimensional accuracy analysis of models produced by 3D printing technology—Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF). Geometric measurements were conducted using a dial caliper, a 3D scanner and a coordinate measuring machine. In addition, a statistical analysis of the test results was carried out, considering the division into different numbers of test samples (3, 5, 10, 20, 30). The analysis of the test results made it possible to assess the influence of the measuring tools used and the number of samples tested on the final measurement result, as well as to determine the consequences associated with it.

show abstract

A Comparison of the CMM and Measuring Scanner for Printing Products Geometry Measurement

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Intrinsic Field-Induced Nanoparticle Assembly in Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Polymeric Composites

Intrinsic Field-Induced Nanoparticle Assembly in Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Polymeric Composites

Estimating the Uncertainty of Measurements for Various Methods and 3D Printed Parts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About