1988
|
Sign up to set email alerts
A comparison of stimulated bite force after mandibular advancement using rigid and nonrigid fixation
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
20
1
1
1
Citation Types
0
4
0
1
Year Published
Range
1989
19892021
2021Publication Types
Select...
16
4
2
Relationship
0
22
Authors
Journals
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
References 21 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In the current study, the period of maxillomandibular fixation did not exceed 14 days in all cases of both the study and the control group. This is advised to avoid any negative musculoskeletal changes or decrease in the range of mandibular opening that may occur if maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was left long (9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of MMF on the masticatory system must be taken in consideration together with the negative muscloskeletal changes that prolonged MMF may cause despite the advantages of conservative treatment (8). These changes include atrophy of the muscles of mastication, thinning of the condylar cartilage of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and decreased range of mandibular opening (9)(10)(11). Some of these changes are reversible to varying degrees, depending on when function is restored via intensive physiotherapy.…”
Section: The Efficacy Of Arthrocentesis On Restoring Mandibular Funct
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In the current study, the period of maxillomandibular fixation did not exceed 14 days in all cases of both the study and the control group. This is advised to avoid any negative musculoskeletal changes or decrease in the range of mandibular opening that may occur if maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was left long (9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of MMF on the masticatory system must be taken in consideration together with the negative muscloskeletal changes that prolonged MMF may cause despite the advantages of conservative treatment (8). These changes include atrophy of the muscles of mastication, thinning of the condylar cartilage of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and decreased range of mandibular opening (9)(10)(11). Some of these changes are reversible to varying degrees, depending on when function is restored via intensive physiotherapy.…”
Section: The Efficacy Of Arthrocentesis On Restoring Mandibular Funct
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A similar discrepancy has been observed when alterations in TPT were produced by experimental manipulation. Ellis et al (1988) documented a postsurgical shortening from 43 to 39 ms in a combined contraction of jaw muscles in rhesus monkeys, which they attributed to a soft diet. Lengthened TPTs were produced in rabbit temporalis (25.5 to 30.1 ms) after masseter removal (Guelinckx et al 1986) and in rat superficial masseter and lateral pterygoid (18.6 to 21.2 ms and 18.2 to 22.4 ms, respectively) after protrusive treatment (Easton and Carlson 1990).…”
Section: Masseter Temporal and Pterygoid Muscles
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5 Till now, many studies have been demonstrated effects of orthognathic surgery on masticatory muscles activity. 1,[6][7][8] SSRO can result in significant changes in thickness and cross-sectional area of masticatory muscles after SSRO which affected the properties of facial morphology. [9][10][11][12][13] Contributing factors to these morphologic changes are those related to surgical procedure or postoperative complications.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In the current study, the period of maxillomandibular fixation did not exceed 14 days in all cases of both the study and the control group. This is advised to avoid any negative musculoskeletal changes or decrease in the range of mandibular opening that may occur if maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was left long (9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of MMF on the masticatory system must be taken in consideration together with the negative muscloskeletal changes that prolonged MMF may cause despite the advantages of conservative treatment (8). These changes include atrophy of the muscles of mastication, thinning of the condylar cartilage of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and decreased range of mandibular opening (9)(10)(11). Some of these changes are reversible to varying degrees, depending on when function is restored via intensive physiotherapy.…”
Section: The Efficacy Of Arthrocentesis On Restoring Mandibular Funct
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A similar discrepancy has been observed when alterations in TPT were produced by experimental manipulation. Ellis et al (1988) documented a postsurgical shortening from 43 to 39 ms in a combined contraction of jaw muscles in rhesus monkeys, which they attributed to a soft diet. Lengthened TPTs were produced in rabbit temporalis (25.5 to 30.1 ms) after masseter removal (Guelinckx et al 1986) and in rat superficial masseter and lateral pterygoid (18.6 to 21.2 ms and 18.2 to 22.4 ms, respectively) after protrusive treatment (Easton and Carlson 1990).…”
Section: Masseter Temporal and Pterygoid Muscles
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5 Till now, many studies have been demonstrated effects of orthognathic surgery on masticatory muscles activity. 1,[6][7][8] SSRO can result in significant changes in thickness and cross-sectional area of masticatory muscles after SSRO which affected the properties of facial morphology. [9][10][11][12][13] Contributing factors to these morphologic changes are those related to surgical procedure or postoperative complications.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In the current study, the period of maxillomandibular fixation did not exceed 14 days in all cases of both the study and the control group. This is advised to avoid any negative musculoskeletal changes or decrease in the range of mandibular opening that may occur if maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was left long (9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of MMF on the masticatory system must be taken in consideration together with the negative muscloskeletal changes that prolonged MMF may cause despite the advantages of conservative treatment (8). These changes include atrophy of the muscles of mastication, thinning of the condylar cartilage of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and decreased range of mandibular opening (9)(10)(11). Some of these changes are reversible to varying degrees, depending on when function is restored via intensive physiotherapy.…”
Section: The Efficacy Of Arthrocentesis On Restoring Mandibular Funct
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A similar discrepancy has been observed when alterations in TPT were produced by experimental manipulation. Ellis et al (1988) documented a postsurgical shortening from 43 to 39 ms in a combined contraction of jaw muscles in rhesus monkeys, which they attributed to a soft diet. Lengthened TPTs were produced in rabbit temporalis (25.5 to 30.1 ms) after masseter removal (Guelinckx et al 1986) and in rat superficial masseter and lateral pterygoid (18.6 to 21.2 ms and 18.2 to 22.4 ms, respectively) after protrusive treatment (Easton and Carlson 1990).…”
Section: Masseter Temporal and Pterygoid Muscles
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5 Till now, many studies have been demonstrated effects of orthognathic surgery on masticatory muscles activity. 1,[6][7][8] SSRO can result in significant changes in thickness and cross-sectional area of masticatory muscles after SSRO which affected the properties of facial morphology. [9][10][11][12][13] Contributing factors to these morphologic changes are those related to surgical procedure or postoperative complications.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 99%