2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of static and dynamic hazard perception tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study is a static task, and although it was designed to simulate some of the decisionmaking cognition that occurs when driving and is consistent with other driving studies (e.g., Huestegge, Skottke, Anders, Musseler, & Debus, 2010;Koustannai et al, 2012;Pammer & Blink, 2013;Scialfa, Borkenhagen, Lyon, & Deschenes, 2013;Scialfa et al, 2012;Wetton et al, 2010), it still only represents a rough facsimile of the real, dynamic driving situation. For example, motion provides drivers with information about the speed of a vehicle to determine whether it is safe to proceed (Caird & Hancock, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The current study is a static task, and although it was designed to simulate some of the decisionmaking cognition that occurs when driving and is consistent with other driving studies (e.g., Huestegge, Skottke, Anders, Musseler, & Debus, 2010;Koustannai et al, 2012;Pammer & Blink, 2013;Scialfa, Borkenhagen, Lyon, & Deschenes, 2013;Scialfa et al, 2012;Wetton et al, 2010), it still only represents a rough facsimile of the real, dynamic driving situation. For example, motion provides drivers with information about the speed of a vehicle to determine whether it is safe to proceed (Caird & Hancock, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Regarding indoor lessons (e.g., in a classroom setting), traffic education has shown to be effective in increasing knowledge about traffic signs [6], in increasing situation awareness using a tabletop model of a traffic environment for identification of safe spots to cross [38] and changing the attitude and behavior [39,40]. Training and evaluation of children hazard perception skills are generally conducted through computers using static [12] and dynamic [41] data from traffic environments for both children as pedestrians [13,42] and bicyclists [43,44]. For pedestrian training, It is normally given indoors using novel approaches such as, using simulator [45] and virtual reality [46] to train children skills for crossing a street safely.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a total of 26 videos; 17 videos present hazards and the remaining nine do not contain any hazards. Scialfa and colleagues (2011, 2012; Scialfa, Borkenhagen, Lyon, & Deschénes, 2013) reported valid and reliable results using a set of 96 videos. The shorter version used in the present study uses a subset of the 96 videos used in previous studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%