2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of ST elevation versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction outcomes in a large registry database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
53
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
53
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our in-hospital mortality rates for STEMI are comparable to the OPERA Registry and Swiss registry of acute coronary syndrome (4.6% and 4.8% for STEMI, respectively) [16,17], but significantly lower than in the PL-ACS Registry Pilot Group, which revealed an in-hospital mortality rate of 11.6% for STEMI and 8.7% for NSTEMI [18]. We also noted that patients with NSTEMI or UA had a more favourable outcome than patients with STEMI, as frequently reported previ-pital mortality, were most commonly pretreated with aspirin, statins and/or beta-blockers on admission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Our in-hospital mortality rates for STEMI are comparable to the OPERA Registry and Swiss registry of acute coronary syndrome (4.6% and 4.8% for STEMI, respectively) [16,17], but significantly lower than in the PL-ACS Registry Pilot Group, which revealed an in-hospital mortality rate of 11.6% for STEMI and 8.7% for NSTEMI [18]. We also noted that patients with NSTEMI or UA had a more favourable outcome than patients with STEMI, as frequently reported previ-pital mortality, were most commonly pretreated with aspirin, statins and/or beta-blockers on admission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Although in-hospital mortality is higher in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) than among those with NSTEMI, long-term follow-up showed worse outcomes in NSTEMI patients [1,2]. It is important to determine factors worsening prognosis in this constantly increasing group of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,5 In patients with cardiovascular disease, the prevalence of OSA ranges between 47 and 83%. 6 Because percutaneous coronary intervention has been considered a sign of poor long-term prognosis of acute coronary syndrome, 7 optimizing related diseases in these patients is critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%