2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of pet and purpose-bred research dog (Canis familiaris) performance on human-guided object-choice tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given their co-evolution with humans1917 and capabilities to respond to human cues17181956, they are an interesting species worth studying to investigate how similar traits may have arisen via evolution. One brain network that has been implicated in cognition in general (as well as in social cognition)5758 is the default mode network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given their co-evolution with humans1917 and capabilities to respond to human cues17181956, they are an interesting species worth studying to investigate how similar traits may have arisen via evolution. One brain network that has been implicated in cognition in general (as well as in social cognition)5758 is the default mode network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the object choice task, dogs need to attend to a person’s point and/or gaze to successfully locate a hidden object. Of note, not only do dogs display joint attention with humans and respond to human pointing and gesturing but they do so better than nonhuman primates making them an excellent animal model for human social cognition9171819. From an evolutionary perspective, the canine advantage is either due to the domestication of dogs (from their predecessors, wolves), their close contact with humans during their daily lives, or is a residual mechanism present before the lineages split 97 million years ago.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barrera, Jakovcevic, Elgier, Mustaca, and Bentosela (2010) showed that, in a simple sociability test, shelter dogs remained closer to passive unknown humans than did pet dogs, but also presented more fearappeasement behaviors. Laboratory-reared dogs and dogs living in shelters have also been found to show an impaired ability to follow subtle human gestural cues to a target in object choice tasks (Lazarowski & Dorman, 2015;Udell, Dorey, & Wynne, 2008;Udell, Dorey, & Wynne, 2010b), although this effect can often be reversed with additional training (Udell et al, 2010b). Shelter dogs also exhibit a faster extinction of gaze toward a human face in the presence of out-of-reach food than do pet dogs (Barrera et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test could potentially be used in veterinary behaviour contexts to monitor cognitive changes in ageing dogs, utilizing a simple binary measure of success. (Halmágyi 2010;Lazarowski & Dorman 2015;Szabó et al 2016;Wallis et al 2014). For these reasons, the use of existing paradigms is limited to laboratory settings, and provides little benefit to the non-laboratory canine population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%