2022 10th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icrito56286.2022.9964557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Manual and Automotive FOD Detection Systems at Airport Runways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, real-time monitoring of airport runways, as well as real-time detection, identification, and localization of FODs, are essential tasks to ensure the safety of air transportation. Currently, the methods widely used for detecting FOD include manual inspection [2], radar detection technology [3][4][5], and optical detection technology [6][7][8]. The manual inspection method may be somewhat effective to some extent, but it lacks efficiency and reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, real-time monitoring of airport runways, as well as real-time detection, identification, and localization of FODs, are essential tasks to ensure the safety of air transportation. Currently, the methods widely used for detecting FOD include manual inspection [2], radar detection technology [3][4][5], and optical detection technology [6][7][8]. The manual inspection method may be somewhat effective to some extent, but it lacks efficiency and reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%