2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Incomplete Resection Rate of Large and Small Colorectal Polyps by Cold Snare Polypectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the possibility of expanding the indication to nonpedunculated polyps larger than 10 mm by combining piecemeal resection is being investigated. Six prospective studies 37,50–54 evaluated the efficacy and safety of piecemeal CSP for larger (>10 mm) lesions. Kimoto et al ., 50 in a study of CSP outcomes for 474 sessile serrated lesions (SSL) larger than 10 mm (mean diameter, 14 mm), reported that 106 lesions (22%) were subjected to piecemeal resection with an IRR of only 0.2%.…”
Section: Possibility Of Expanding the Indication For Cspmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the possibility of expanding the indication to nonpedunculated polyps larger than 10 mm by combining piecemeal resection is being investigated. Six prospective studies 37,50–54 evaluated the efficacy and safety of piecemeal CSP for larger (>10 mm) lesions. Kimoto et al ., 50 in a study of CSP outcomes for 474 sessile serrated lesions (SSL) larger than 10 mm (mean diameter, 14 mm), reported that 106 lesions (22%) were subjected to piecemeal resection with an IRR of only 0.2%.…”
Section: Possibility Of Expanding the Indication For Cspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kimoto et al, 50 in a study of CSP outcomes for 474 sessile serrated lesions (SSL) larger than 10 mm (mean diameter, 14 mm), reported that 106 lesions (22%) were subjected to piecemeal resection with an IRR of only 0.2%. In an analysis of CSP outcomes of 440 colorectal polyps that measured 15 mm or smaller, Ma et al 53 reported that a risk factor that was associated with IRR was resection time (OR 7.39; 95% CI 1.48-36.96; P = 0.015), but lesion size was not. This report included 87 lesions (19.77%) with 10-15 mm polyps, but only five lesions (1.14%) were subjected to piecemeal resection and only one lesion (0.23%) was incompletely resected.…”
Section: Lesions Larger Than 10 MMmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In colonoscopy, accurate localization of lesions identified during a procedure is critical for guiding inspection in follow up procedures. Typically, polyp and CRC locations are reported by dividing the colon into segments, and recording the colon segment that includes each site [10] , [11] . The scale of colonoscopy’s localization problem is obvious during CRC tumor removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al reported the safety and efficacy of CSP for colorectal polyps, including SSLs, measuring between 5 and 15 mm and analyzed the factors influencing the IRR. 7 This was a prospective single-center observational study including the data of 440 colorectal neoplastic polyps. The primary outcome of IRR was determined by the presence of residual neoplasm in the biopsy sample obtained from the resection margin after CSP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al . reported the safety and efficacy of CSP for colorectal polyps, including SSLs, measuring between 5 and 15 mm and analyzed the factors influencing the IRR 7 . This was a prospective single‐center observational study including the data of 440 colorectal neoplastic polyps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%