2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of four screening methods for cervical neoplasia

Abstract: Visual inspection and colposcopy should not be used when screening for early stage cervical lesions. The DNA hybridization assay is the best choice in primary screening, if available. Screening should begin at the age of 20 years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1,[3][4][5][6] The addition of DSI to conventional colposcopy therefore results in an almost 50% increase in sensitivity; from 55% to 79% by DSI colposcopy alone if all preconditions for a optimal examination are met, and to 80% in combination with conventional colposcopy regardless of the circumstances or individual user adequacy. Hence, the higher sensitivity of DSI colposcopy alone or in combination with conventional colposcopy improves the detection of high-grade cervical lesions significantly and guides cervical sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,[3][4][5][6] The addition of DSI to conventional colposcopy therefore results in an almost 50% increase in sensitivity; from 55% to 79% by DSI colposcopy alone if all preconditions for a optimal examination are met, and to 80% in combination with conventional colposcopy regardless of the circumstances or individual user adequacy. Hence, the higher sensitivity of DSI colposcopy alone or in combination with conventional colposcopy improves the detection of high-grade cervical lesions significantly and guides cervical sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The variation in the reported performance for colposcopy is high, with the average sensitivity of colposcopy to distinguish low-from high-grade lesions and cancer being around 55%. 1,[3][4][5][6] Furthermore, the low to average sensitivity and specificity of colposcopic examination is also associated with a high degree of inter-and intra-observer variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, while the incidence of CIN2 ϩ was Ͼ40% in the 2316 patients whose data were used to calculate the NPV, this is much higher than the previously reported rate of 8%. [32][33][34] This would explain the low NPV of HPV testing to detect CIN2 ϩ (ie, 82.4%). Furthermore, the results of this study may be more applicable to high-risk women undergoing consultation rather than primary cervical screenings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Данная система отображения производит независимое от исследователя, количественное измерение и отображение эффектов ук-сусной кислоты. Это гарантирует значительное улучше-ние диагностики различия между цервикальной интра-эпителиальной неоплазией высокой степени и пораже-ний с низкой степенью злокачественности или в ее отсут-ствие, что было рассмотрено и изучено в работах ведущих специалистов данного направления [3,[18][19][20].…”
unclassified
“…По результа-там исследования получено заключение: DуSIS-картирование является более чувствительным, чем рас-ширенная КС, в обнаружении выраженных изменений (79% в сравнении с 49%). Кроме того, при использовании DySIS-картирования увеличивается чувствительность до 77% в выявлении высоковыраженных поражений шейки матки, особенно у пациенток с LSIL по результатам цито-логии против 19% при применении традиционной КС [19] (рис. 4).…”
unclassified