1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)32938-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Five Serological Tests for the Diagnosis of Experimental Corynebacterium ovis Infection in Sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, this test showed high capability in detecting specific antibodies in the very early steps of infection, as all animals have detectable specific antibodies between 6 and 11 days after infection, earlier therefore than other published results with well known less sensitive tests (synergistic haemolysis inhibition test and bacterial agglutination test) (Kuria et al, 2001). However, as our experimental infection procedure provoked only a sub-clinical infection state, as could be expected and already described (Shigidi, 1979;Ellis et al, 1990), this indirect diagnostic tool showed a lack of specificity, as two out of the three animals without granuloma at slaughter were still positive by ELISA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…On the other hand, this test showed high capability in detecting specific antibodies in the very early steps of infection, as all animals have detectable specific antibodies between 6 and 11 days after infection, earlier therefore than other published results with well known less sensitive tests (synergistic haemolysis inhibition test and bacterial agglutination test) (Kuria et al, 2001). However, as our experimental infection procedure provoked only a sub-clinical infection state, as could be expected and already described (Shigidi, 1979;Ellis et al, 1990), this indirect diagnostic tool showed a lack of specificity, as two out of the three animals without granuloma at slaughter were still positive by ELISA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Several diagnostic methods have been proposed for the diagnosis of CLA, including indirect hemagglutination [102], complement fixation [100], immunodiffusion [103], the synergistic inhibition of hemolysis [35] and PCR [104]. Numerous serological tests have been developed to detect antibodies against C. pseudotuberculosis in small ruminants [105].…”
Section: Serological Diagnosis Of Clamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the import regulations for goats, especially from countries where the disease is endemic, should be extended to include examinations relevant to the detection of the disease. In addition to clinical inspections serological techniques may be utilised, of which several have been described (8,17,22,23,29). However, chronically infected cases often escape serological detection.…”
Section: Therapy and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%