2007
DOI: 10.1109/tdmr.2007.911385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Fast Methods for Measuring NBTI Degradation

Abstract: Three fast measuring methods, namely, "on-the-fly," fast direct threshold-voltage (V T ) determination, and fast draincurrent measurement near V T , are compared. Problems of the different methods are thoroughly discussed, and an analysis of systematic and statistical errors has been done. An example comparing the V T data extracted from the three methods is given. The results help us to understand the root causes for the observed differences in drift curves.Index Terms-Measuring delay, MOSFET, negative bias t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, during recovery, discharging occurs earlier than the measurement window [11,12]. We remark that reports exist claiming that the minimum time constants are in the order of 1µs [13,14]; however, this is not in agreement with other data that show degradation and recovery are already in full flight at 1µs [10][11][12].…”
Section: Theorycontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, during recovery, discharging occurs earlier than the measurement window [11,12]. We remark that reports exist claiming that the minimum time constants are in the order of 1µs [13,14]; however, this is not in agreement with other data that show degradation and recovery are already in full flight at 1µs [10][11][12].…”
Section: Theorycontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…A particularly intriguing observation is that neither the fastest nor slowest trap are normally observable during stress or recovery. During stress, even with a measurement resolution of 1µs, the degradation takes place outside the measurement range [10]. Similarly, during recovery, discharging occurs earlier than the measurement window [11,12].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• ΔV T estimation [12,16,23]: This one is a more challenging, because interpretation of ΔI D into ΔV T requires one to have adequate knowledge Δμ eff (ΔV T ) and Δm(ΔV T ), which is generally not available in OTF-I D measurements. Since we have calculated these quantities through separate measurements in the last section, we can develop an algorithm for ΔV T estimation [12] from ΔI D .…”
Section: δμ Eff (N It ) In δV T Estimation For Otf-i Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…threshold voltage degradation or ΔV T ) measurement; because it involves V T determination from I D -V G sweeps that requires sufficient time for stable measurements (except for the ultra-fast scheme [15], which is again limited due to noise issues [16]). This limitation of classical techniques motivated different groups to propose indirect methods of estimating ΔV T [17][18][19], in a way of achieving so called "recovery-free" NBTI measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation