2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91125-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Testing on Performance of Blockchain and Relational Database: Foundation for Applying Smart Technology into Current Business Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this study also pointed out that the performances of both platforms are still not competitive with current mainstream database systems, especially under high workloads. This conclusion was tested and confirmed by another, more recent study [84], in which Ethereum and MySQL were compared.…”
Section: ) Dag Dlt Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, this study also pointed out that the performances of both platforms are still not competitive with current mainstream database systems, especially under high workloads. This conclusion was tested and confirmed by another, more recent study [84], in which Ethereum and MySQL were compared.…”
Section: ) Dag Dlt Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Although previous research concluded that the performance of blockchain limits its applicability in various industries, they recommended that a practical solution may be combining blockchain with relational databases to implement industrial functions [43]. In this work, results indicate that there is no significant difference between the proposed Med-Chain and the traditional relational system.…”
Section: ) Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The network coverage is set as a circular area with radius 150 m. The radius of interference area is D 0 = 50 m. The transmit power of TN is 20 dBm, and the noise power is −104 dBm [29]. The transaction packet length is 256 bits [30], and the transaction arrival rate is (1/1800) s −1 [24]. The total considered time is 10 000 s. For convenience, all the parameters are summarized as Table II.…”
Section: A Simulation Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%