rdlc 2020
DOI: 10.7764/rdlc.19.1.103-111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on prediction models for strength properties of LWA concrete using artificial neural network

Abstract: In this study, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model is constructed to predict the compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength of lightweight aggregate concrete made of sintered fly ash aggregate. An empirical relationship between the compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength was developed and compared with that of experimental results. The models were formulated based on results obtained from laboratory experiments. The variables considered in the study are the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, splitting tensile strength is one of the mechanical properties of importance in the design of concrete structures [38,39] because cracking in concrete is generally due to tensile stresses that occur under load or due to environmental changes [40]. Machine learning methods have been employed to predict the splitting tensile strength of concrete, with the most widely used being neural networks (ANN) [32,36,[41][42][43][44][45][46], support vector machine (SVM) [16,19,37,38,42,44,45,[47][48][49], eXtreme gradient boosting (XG Boost) [19,37,44], random forest (RF) [16,19,49], decision tree regressor (DTR) [16,27], gradient boosting regressor (GBR) [16,37], and finally multilayer perceptron (MLPs) [37,49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, splitting tensile strength is one of the mechanical properties of importance in the design of concrete structures [38,39] because cracking in concrete is generally due to tensile stresses that occur under load or due to environmental changes [40]. Machine learning methods have been employed to predict the splitting tensile strength of concrete, with the most widely used being neural networks (ANN) [32,36,[41][42][43][44][45][46], support vector machine (SVM) [16,19,37,38,42,44,45,[47][48][49], eXtreme gradient boosting (XG Boost) [19,37,44], random forest (RF) [16,19,49], decision tree regressor (DTR) [16,27], gradient boosting regressor (GBR) [16,37], and finally multilayer perceptron (MLPs) [37,49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on concrete and RAC using ANN modeling have been evaluated to predict the performance characteristics of the resulting products. The ANN modeling used to predict concrete performance characteristics include the slump of fly ash and slag concrete (Yeh 2006), setting time and compressive strength of concrete with aluminum waste and sawdust ash (George and Elvis 2019), compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength of lightweight aggregate concrete (Nagarajan et al 2020), bond strength of reinforcement of concrete (Yartsev et al 2019), demystified behavior of cement-based materials (Chabib and Nehdi 2005), and compressive strength of concrete containing waste rubber (Nyarko et al 2019). From the RAC aspect, some ANN modeling studies have predicted its performance characteristics since 2013, including compressive strength (Deshpande et al 2014;Duan et al 2013bDuan et al , 2018Getahun et al 2018;Kandiri et al 2021;Khademi et al 2016), tensile strength (Getahun et al 2018), modulus of elasticity (Duan et al 2013a(Duan et al , 2018Seyedhamed et al 2019), triaxial loading behavior (Xu et al 2019), water permeability (Chen et al 2020), and dynamic modulus and permanent strain (Ghorbani et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing with the standard concrete the light weight concrete is twenty to twenty ve percent lighter (Lo and Cui 2002). Structural light weight concrete has more exibility, minimum dead weight, strong seismic response, and low cost for foundation (Nagarajan et al 2020). The primary drawback of light weight concrete is it requires more cement to produce the same strength as normal concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%