2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00227-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on growth performance and biochemical composition of mixed culture of Isochrysis galbana and Chaetoceros calcitrans with monocultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No adaptation phase was detected in either culture. If it did occur, it was very mild, similar to that reported by Phatarpekar et al (2000) for the same species; this could be attributed to faster cellular reproduction than in other species. For example, adaptation phases longer than 1 day have been reported for Chaetoceros muelleri and C. gracilis, Tetraselmis tetrathele and T. gracilis, Dunaliella salina and D. tertiolecta, and Navicula incerta, among others (Calderón & Serpa, 2003;Leal et al, 2003;Affan et al, 2007;MouraJunior et al, 2007).…”
Section: Growth and Cryopreservationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…No adaptation phase was detected in either culture. If it did occur, it was very mild, similar to that reported by Phatarpekar et al (2000) for the same species; this could be attributed to faster cellular reproduction than in other species. For example, adaptation phases longer than 1 day have been reported for Chaetoceros muelleri and C. gracilis, Tetraselmis tetrathele and T. gracilis, Dunaliella salina and D. tertiolecta, and Navicula incerta, among others (Calderón & Serpa, 2003;Leal et al, 2003;Affan et al, 2007;MouraJunior et al, 2007).…”
Section: Growth and Cryopreservationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The maximum absorbance was achieved at the end of the stationary phase. Previous works reported values of μ: 0.225-0.665 d − 1 and dt: 3.080-1.042 d for Chaetoceros calcitrans (Phatarpekar et al, 2000), and values of μ: 0.33-1.97 d − 1 and dt: 2.100-0.352 d for I. affinis galbana (T-Iso), obtained by optimizing growth conditions (Marchetti et al, 2012). Regarding N. gaditana and P. tricornutum values of μ: 0.2-1.44 d − 1 , dt: 3.46-0.48 d, and of μ: 0.2-1.44 d −1 , dt: 3.46-0.48 d, respectively, have been also reported .…”
Section: Microalgae Maximum Absorbancementioning
confidence: 89%
“…This effect is caused by the photooxidation reaction inside the cell as the excess light cannot be absorbed into the photosynthetic apparatus. Different species of microalgae respond differently to light intensity and photoperiod Renaud et al 1991;Ma et al 1997;Phatarpekar et al 2002;Danesi et al 2004;Richmond 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%