2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-6111(02)00093-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of warping and rigid body registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are numerous deformable algorithms, including, for example, the elastic model (32-34), viscous fluid model (35), optical flow model (5,30,36), finite element model (33,37), and radial basis function models such as the basis spline model (28,38,39) and thin plate spline model (40)(41)(42)(43), a truly robust tool suitable for routine clinical applications is yet to be developed. Each of these approaches has its pros and cons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are numerous deformable algorithms, including, for example, the elastic model (32-34), viscous fluid model (35), optical flow model (5,30,36), finite element model (33,37), and radial basis function models such as the basis spline model (28,38,39) and thin plate spline model (40)(41)(42)(43), a truly robust tool suitable for routine clinical applications is yet to be developed. Each of these approaches has its pros and cons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control points are manually selected for many TPS applications. 13,25,26 This may introduce interuser variability and is a major source of error. Malsch et al presented an automatic block matching method, 18 which is similar to the control volume based approach proposed by Schreibmann and Xing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thinplate spline is essentially an interpolation method; it yields a parametric form of a registration transformation function that sends the landmarks in one image to the corresponding landmarks in the other, and at the same time smoothly interpolates this formula to all of the other points in the image. Other authors (56,57) conducted studies on the ability to improve registration results as compared to rigid registration by using a nearly automated combination of thin-plate splines and a mutual information measure of image agreement. Similarly, in Venugopal et al (58) the authors conducted a feasibility study on the use of thin-plate splines to allow the use of MR spectroscopy during prostate cancer therapy.…”
Section: Thin-plate Spline Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%